<span>2. to promote conservation in support of the troops
The poster is promoting the view that "food will win the war". They also draw many of the people's lives or family history, in that they (or their ancestors) came to the US for freedom, and now that their freedom is under attack by the Central Power, they must fight to preserve it.
hope this helps</span>
Answer: Hoover offered nothing, unlike Roosevelt, on the economic crisis.
Explanation:
- Hoover and Roosevelt were presidents during the most significant economic crisis in American history. First, Hoover was elected president, facing eight of the most substantial financial problems in US history eight months after his inauguration. Hoover was struggling to cope with the economic woes that the crisis had brought with him. He has steadfastly refused to reach out to the Federal Reserve to help the troubled economy. His efforts to solve the problem of the economic crisis have proved unsuccessful. Thus, he intended to reduce corporate taxes to stimulate the economy and free it from government influence, which caused even more damage. Eventually, hundreds of thousands of people were impoverished and impoverished in the streets.
- Roosevelt, on the other hand, has come up with more concrete solutions to cope with the economic crisis. The New Deal Economic Reform Package has provided some - such solutions - to the troubled economy. The package thus implied an impetus for public works that entailed work on the state's infrastructure. With that, he employed tens of thousands of Americans. He ordered Congress to set up a commission to oversee the banking sector and, as part of the same reform, provide savings to Americans who feared they would be left out in the event of a bank collapse. The Indian Reorganization Act stopped the sale of Native American land and returned the Indians to their property.
A thesis statement that would not be acceptable is <u>B. The </u><u>Chesapeake </u><u>and </u><u>New England colonies </u><u>developed into</u><u> two distinct societies </u><u>based on their </u><u>geography</u><u>, </u><u>reasons </u><u>for </u><u>founding</u><u>, </u><u>economic </u><u>characteristics, and </u><u>relationships </u><u>with </u><u>American Indians.</u>
You did not include the prompt in the question but the above should be the best answer.
The New England Colonies and the Chesapeake colonies were different in that:
- New England colonies were founded to escape religious persecution while the Chesapeake colonies were founded to make profit
- New England colonies engaged in shipping, food production and lumbering whereas the Chesapeake colonies focused on tobacco.
Even though they were different in the above regard, their treatment of Native Americans was the same as they both started off with peaceful relations with the Natives which eventually deteriorated into war.
We can therefore conclude that even though they differed in several ways, they did not differ in Native treatment which would make option B wrong.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18193023.</em>
Answer:
To stay out of it. To be neutral. They provided materials to be sides until Pearl Harbor attack.
Explanation:
They felt the citizens would not support being in a war that did not involve us especially just as we were coming out of the great depression.