In the past past, during Great Depression no one liked them because they had a whole bunch of rights and things that the poor/ lower class didn’t. Also in 1800s the upper class was the kings and rich men of the world, no one liked them because they were greedy and didn’t care for others but themselves
Hey there!
1.I'm not sure about the first one
2. An absentee ballot
Answer:
For free market economy, we can explain it in 3 expects. First, because households are the 'owners' of productive resources, firms have to pay them for their resources in the resource market, they can produce everything they want, the type and amount of products are determined by every individual firms, but they should produce the goods and service that other companies or household want, and can make the maximum profits, more profits, more motive for the producers. Prices are determined by householders.
While For the centrally planned economy, (it is also called command economy), all the resources (land, labour and capital) in the market are allocated by government, and it makes all the productive decisions, including price determination, so, the centrally planned economy is a government-controlled economic situation. First, a centrally planned economy may choose to produce whatever the government decides is most crucial to meeting society's needs, the government should provide services and goods that can cater to the people's need. Like in the 19th and 20th centuries period, in China, Mao Zedong realized that China is under a low level of heavy industry, so he decided to develop it first, then the light industry, this decision is sensible and realistic.
<span>Muckrackers is the name given to journalist who focused on the poverty and corruption in the cities. The correct answer is C. They sensationalized these events and wrote about scandals and corruptions in their columns. Carpetbaggers were people who moved from the North of America to the South after the American Civil War. Crusaders were holy warriors who fought Islam. Reformers are just people who want to make a reform in a system.</span>
Answer:
<h2>
The Louisiana Purchase
</h2>
<em>[You didn't show the map, but that's the probable answer.]
</em>
Explanation:
President Thomas Jefferson commissioned James Monroe and Robert Livingston to negotiate a deal with France to acquire New Orleans or all or part of Florida. When they went to France to negotiate, Monroe and Livingston found that Napoleon was ready to sell a much wider range of territory to the United States, to finance his European wars. Napoleon was asking $22 million for the whole territory that became the Louisiana Purchase. The US team negotiated the price down to $15 million.
Then there was a constitutional crisis back home: Did the President have the authority under the constitution to make such a major addition to the nation's territory and spend the nation's funds to do so? Jefferson himself initially thought a constitutional amendment might be necessary to authorize such a large action. Ultimately, Jefferson simply sought approval of the purchase from Congress. He used this analogy to describe what his administration was doing on behalf of the country: "“It is the case of a guardian, investing the money of his ward in purchasing an important adjacent territory; and saying to him when of age, I did this for your good."
