Answer:
need
Explanation:
Question of policy is basically a question whether or not an actions should be performed in order to change the existing conditions.
In analyzing the question of policy there are three issues:
1) need - determining is there a serious problem and is there a need for solving it
2) plan - if such a problem exists what is the plan (course of action) for solving it
3) practicality - if the plan is accepted, will it soove the problem or will it just make it worse and open some new issues
Casey's speech contains pointing out the problem and providing the evidence to support the claim. The speech doesn't suggest any plan nor further analysis, rather it just states the problem which can affect both, the crops and people.
2 hours a day I think or sometimes an hour is enough
Answer:
Inference.
Explanation:
Inference can be defined as an idea or the conclusion that is drawn based on the proofs provided and reasoning. When a person makes an inference, he/she assume some premises based on non-logical or logical deduction to be true.
<u>As stated in the question, putting altogether new information and information that is already known in a platter to make a sense of what we read. Inference is made on daily basis, </u><u>for</u><u> </u><u>example</u><u>, if my colleague did not come to office today and he/she told me about his/her bad health yesterday, I will make an inference by combining this information that he/she did not come to office today as he/she was not well yesterday</u>.
So, the correct answer is an inference.
From the pictures we can infer that they appeal to the interests in the beauty of Niagara Falls.
The correct answer is C. Faculty
Explanation:
An analogy is a correspondence or comparison between one element or set of elements and another which in most cases aimed at showing the similarities between the elements that compose the analogy. This means an analogy occurs when two elements relate in the same way or the characteristics of an element are transferred to another. In the case of the example presented in the question "laboratory:campus" it suggests the laboratory belongs to the campus, is part of the campus or can be found in the campus, which means the second analogy should accomplish the same feature of belonging, being part or being found to create a correspondence or similarity between both elements. Because of this the best option that completes the analogy is "professor: faculty" as in the same way of "laboratory: campus" the professor somehow belongs to the campus, can be found there or is part of the campus in terms of staff, this means in this way both elements "professor: faculty" and "laboratory: campus" express the same relationship and therefore there is a correspondence or analogy.
