Answer:
B) The letter of intent is an invitation to negotiate, which is not an offer.
Explanation:
A letter of intent is simply an invitation to negotiate any type of transaction, sales or lease. The amounts included in the letter can serve as a basis for the negotiating or bargaining process, but they are not fixed and even Ryan can change them. This is similar to an ad in a newspaper that offers something for sale. Until the bargaining process is over and both parties agree on the consideration exchange and other terms, it is just a notice without any legal value.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Whenever a company sells products that may generate warranty expenses, it must estimate the warranty expenses associated with the products sold.
It must credit a warrant liability account, and as the warrant claims are made, the company must debit a warranty expense account.
Answer: a). Spain
b). none
c). 2.4
Explanation: a). Absolute advantage occurs when a country produces more of a good than the other country. In this case, Spain produces 50 units of Tractors while, Bolivia produces only 30 units of Tractors. Thus, Since Spain is producing more it has an absolute advantage in Tractors.
b). Both the countries are producing equal units of Cotton. Thus, we can say that none of them has an absolute advantage in cotton production.
c. Opportunity cost is the cost of the lost alternative. When Spain produces Tractors it is sacrificing production of Cotton. So, opportunity cost on 1 unit of Tractor will be,

Thus, 2.4 units of cotton which is given up is the opportunity cost of Spain for producing 1 unit of Tractor.
Answer:
Anne Mullens committed embezzlement.
Explanation:
Embezzlement is defined as misappropriation of funds by someone with whom funds have been entrusted.
It is a theft as the money does not belong to the perpetrator. The perpetrator is only entrusted with funds.
One of the conditions for embezzlement is an existence of a fiduciary (trust) relationship between parties.
In the given case, Anne Mullens pocketed $57 cash from recorded amount instead of recording 57$ customer's payment via check. Instead she included the customer's check in the money to be taken to bank.
This is embezzlement of funds by Anne.
Answer:
<h3>true or if i wrong fulse so </h3>