1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
1 year ago
15

Why didn't the leaders of the United States opt to simply revise or impose the article of Confederation of 1787

History
1 answer:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]1 year ago
4 0
<h3>Answer:</h3>

The Articles of Confederation were the first document used by the nation to unify the states.

However, people accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the Articles allowed for.

Contextualization

To understand why the Articles had to be completely scrapped, we need to understand how the Articles worked.

The Articles said that the states were simply a Confederation as opposed to a fully united country.

  • A confederation is an organization of groups allied together.

The Articles were a prime example of how America was scared of becoming England after its independence. They avoided any form of a strong federal government that could hold the states together. Additionally, Americans were so tired of taxation without representation, that the Articles made it impossible for the federal government to impose taxes. Also, there was no way for the federal government to settle disputes between different states.

All of these factors led to the downfall of the Articles and the creation of the Consitution.

Creation of a New Consitution

Over time, the problems listed above became apparent. The federal government was collapsing because it had no form of income. Without any taxes, the federal government could not function. After the war, inflation was on the raise and congress couldn't help because it had no budget.

States also had trouble keeping up with the new freedom and had no federal government to turn to. The states had in-fighting with no federal courts to make nationwide decisions. Territory disputes could also not be solved with the existing government structure.

Eventually, people came to the agreement that we needed a new constitution that allowed for a functioning federal government. The Articles could not simply be fixed. It was too weak and left no opening for a federal government, so the Constitutional Convention assembled and wrote the Constitution.

You might be interested in
How did the end of the Mexican-American War create more tension between the North and the South?
mel-nik [20]

Territories obtained in the Mexican American War of 1848 caused further sectional strife over the expansion of slavery.

<h3>What is Mexican-American War?</h3>

Mexican-American War can be regarded as the annexation of republic of Texas which occured as a result of dispute over the boundary of Texas is at Nueces river .

This war create more tension between the North and the South because of sectional strife over the expansion of slavery.

Learn more about Mexican-American War at;

brainly.com/question/14365527

5 0
1 year ago
Why would a nativist support immigration quotas and the Chinese exclusion act
Len [333]

Answer:

curb the influx of Chinese immigrants to the United States, particularly California, The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 suspended Chinese immigration for ten years and declared Chinese immigrants ineligible for naturalization. President Chester A. Arthur signed it into law on May 6, 1882.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
The New Jersey plan called for
solniwko [45]
The Plan called for each state to have one vote<span> in Congress instead of the number of votes being based on population.

</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think that informal changes to the constitution are as important as formal amendments? Explain Why.
Vladimir79 [104]
A "Formal Amendment" is one that actually adds to or changes the US Constitution. It is ratified by the states and becomes law. 

<span>An "informal amendment"is a change to the meaning or interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. There is no real informal way to change the Constitution, and it's not an actual change to the wording of the Constitution; rather, it's the way we perceive the Constitution that changes. </span>

<span>The one that comes to mind is the equal rights amendment (1972) - which prohibits the inequality of men and women. Opponents say that the amendment is no longer needed, as the issues are already law</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Use what you know about the case of Gideon v. Wainwright to determine which of the following phrases is etched on Gideon's grave
mel-nik [20]

The correct answer is A. Each era.....

Saw my quiz results.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Something that is always the same:
    6·1 answer
  • How did the Great Depression effect the rest of the economies of the world
    10·1 answer
  • Of the four sections of Justinian's Code, Institutiones was meant for
    5·2 answers
  • The vast grasslands that border the great desert region of the Sahara are known as
    6·2 answers
  • Gideon v. Wainwright established ...
    12·2 answers
  • Luftwaffe from flying because oil became more scarce.
    14·1 answer
  • Are you really a Christian?​
    13·2 answers
  • wealth inequality in Brazil is shown by what shanty in town villages? I can't find the answer so this would be helpful!​
    14·1 answer
  • Which technology was not a major advancement for World War I?
    9·1 answer
  • pamphlet authored by william lloyd garrison arguing that black people must be recognized as part of american society, not viewed
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!