1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
1 year ago
15

Why didn't the leaders of the United States opt to simply revise or impose the article of Confederation of 1787

History
1 answer:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]1 year ago
4 0
<h3>Answer:</h3>

The Articles of Confederation were the first document used by the nation to unify the states.

However, people accepted that the country needed a stronger central government than the Articles allowed for.

Contextualization

To understand why the Articles had to be completely scrapped, we need to understand how the Articles worked.

The Articles said that the states were simply a Confederation as opposed to a fully united country.

  • A confederation is an organization of groups allied together.

The Articles were a prime example of how America was scared of becoming England after its independence. They avoided any form of a strong federal government that could hold the states together. Additionally, Americans were so tired of taxation without representation, that the Articles made it impossible for the federal government to impose taxes. Also, there was no way for the federal government to settle disputes between different states.

All of these factors led to the downfall of the Articles and the creation of the Consitution.

Creation of a New Consitution

Over time, the problems listed above became apparent. The federal government was collapsing because it had no form of income. Without any taxes, the federal government could not function. After the war, inflation was on the raise and congress couldn't help because it had no budget.

States also had trouble keeping up with the new freedom and had no federal government to turn to. The states had in-fighting with no federal courts to make nationwide decisions. Territory disputes could also not be solved with the existing government structure.

Eventually, people came to the agreement that we needed a new constitution that allowed for a functioning federal government. The Articles could not simply be fixed. It was too weak and left no opening for a federal government, so the Constitutional Convention assembled and wrote the Constitution.

You might be interested in
What side did Native Americans originally support when the Civil War broke out?
Vlada [557]
They served both sides, sometimes it just depended on whose land was where. 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how did the 13th amendment affect the relationship between the states &amp; the national government and/or the relationship betw
MariettaO [177]

Answer:

the all new 3th is not affecting the relationship between all states because the national government is her/or any rason to believe love

Explanation:

sana po ay makatulong

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was most responsible for the ethnic diversity that developed in Washington during the years of growth?
blondinia [14]
Weyerhaeuser timber company
3 0
3 years ago
When an archaeologist finds an ancient artifact on a dig, how should they determine its relative age?
Mice21 [21]

By Compare the artifact to other things found at the sites they determine its relative age.

Compare the artifact to other things found at the same place.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Over the period of time, the artifacts which are lying under the ground gets covered by the layers and layers of soil and the archaeologists can determine the age of the artifacts by relative technique where the artifacts dug out from the same sites are compared and analysed and then it is approximately given the relative age.

Though it is not a very reliable method as the artifacts gets shifts from place sometimes and may go deeper under the soil or come closer to the surface. Therefore, Absolute method was discovered and is used.

4 0
3 years ago
What was one effect of the Interstate Highway Act of 1957?
denpristay [2]
This act spread the growth of the suburbs vastly along the side of the interstate highway systems. the purpose of this act was to build a good and stable system of interstate highway for easier travel purposes 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was a British leader who criticized Britain’s treatment of the American colonies?
    6·1 answer
  • The act that prohibited the president from removing federal officials previously approved by the Senate was the: Command of the
    7·2 answers
  • which of the following statements would likely have come from someone living on the west coast of medieval europe
    11·1 answer
  • Qual a principal diferença entre os processos de colonização?
    6·1 answer
  • What type of government did the Framers want to create?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did Hitler most likely believe Germany had a right to invade other countries?
    15·2 answers
  • Si 3<br> /5x = 9, entonces 5x =
    5·1 answer
  • Which Islamic group was responsible for the Golden Age of Islam in Spain?
    13·2 answers
  • What does the federal government provide to
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to Israel after Solomon's death? pls help :)
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!