Answer:
Jean-Paul Sartre would've accepted it if it wasn't for his writing but he declined for personell reasons. (Mark me brainliest please)
Explanation:
The 59-year-old author Jean-Paul Sartre declined the Nobel Prize in Literature, which he was awarded in October 1964. He said he always refused official distinctions and did not want to be “institutionalised”. He also told the press he rejected the Nobel Prize for fear that it would limit the impact of his writing.
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
The correct answer is A. It is correct because it is a hyperbole, or a exaggerated statement.
The first one answer is the correct answer
