Answer:
Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?
Explanation: The poem is written about the uprising of 1953 in East Germany. It transmits how the government had disappointed the people and how nobody believed in anything anymore. The author finishes the poem with a key question; "Would it not be easier in that case for the government to dissolve the people, and elect another?". These stanzas make the reader reflect on how difficult it is for the people to elect a good leader, and how difficult it is for the government to lead and don't break society's trust.
The plural possessive noun of the word "Child", would be "Children's", instead of the plural version of that word "Children", since the word "Children" is an irregular plural, therefore the plural possessive noun of the word "Child", is "Children's".
I'm not sure what the story "To Build a Fire" is, but I hope I can help you by telling you that "third person" is when the characters/protagonist are described through "he", "she", etc. and "omniscient point of view" is all seeing, therefore, options 2 and 4 are impossible.
The answer is:
C) It is ironic that the young married women have so much, and yet feel quiet unhappy.
Irony is the opposite meaning of what is expressed.
In the excerpt, the narrator makes reference to the comfortable lives of many young, married women who were dissatisfied with their existences. For example, he mentions they owned servants and various kitchen devices, so they did not need to do much housework or even cook. They also had few or no children and worked two hours a day. As a result, they spent their time eating chocolate, gossiping, playing cards, going to the cinema and reading magazines. However, they felt their lives were empty and with a feeling of unrest.
