1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga55 [171]
2 years ago
14

Use examples from both sources to explain similarities and differences in the author's claims about the: interactions between Na

tives and European explorers the impact European explorers had on Native populations
History
1 answer:
VLD [36.1K]2 years ago
6 0

Interactions between natives and European explorers had an impact on native populations by instituting new social and economic dynamics.

<h3 /><h3>What are the impacts of colonization on the native population?</h3>

Indigenous culture was directly impacted by the arrival of European explorers to the Americas, who instituted a new religion, customs, in addition to having used the natives to practice slave labor and having contaminated this population with new diseases, such as influenza and smallpox.

Therefore, historically it is possible to see that European colonization in the new world had negative impacts on native populations, which were significantly reduced by violence and diseases brought by explorers.

Find out more about European colonization here:

brainly.com/question/19482514

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Social studies information for tips to help you before a test
kupik [55]
Get a good sleep, breakfast, and dinner. Don't stay up all night playing video games the night before. Chew gum, which helps you focus.
8 0
2 years ago
Why was abraham lincoln's assassination bad for the south
liq [111]
Some people in the north thought of all the south as barbaric. Also he wanted only for a unified america to emerge. It was also bad for the south because a new civil war almost arose.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Godkin feel about the Ku Klux Klan?
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

B. It was an inevitable result of the approach to Reconstruction.

Explanation:

Godkin feels that the Ku Klux Klan "was an inevitable result of the approach to Reconstruction."

Godkin described the Ku Klux Klan as like cholera coming out or originated naturally from the filthy areas. And it is a result of how the country managed the whole Reconstruction approach in the South.

However, he concluded that the Ku Klux Klan pose no solution to the problem ravaging the south.

4 0
2 years ago
Why do some people not support voter registration because ?
Leto [7]

Answer:

because that is there personal opinion

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
What opportunity did many colonial countries have after World War II?
eimsori [14]

Answer:

D to decide their own government

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is an example of a unitary government?
    7·2 answers
  • Why was it custom to not enter persian kings inner court without being summoned?
    11·1 answer
  • Deforestation often occurs because of efforts to clear land for new farms. Describe a consequence of deforestation by discussing
    7·2 answers
  • What are 2 criticisms of the presidential primary system
    6·2 answers
  • Which was NOT a factor of migration?
    7·2 answers
  • What was true about the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution?
    8·2 answers
  • The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that mandated "popular sovereignty"–allowing settlers of a territory to decide whether
    14·1 answer
  • Germany started World War I by attacking the French.<br> True <br> False
    13·1 answer
  • PLS HELP! 30 points
    13·2 answers
  • Which region of Texas is known for its mountains? <br> A) 1<br> B) 2 <br> C) 3 <br> D) 4
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!