1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadusha1986 [10]
1 year ago
9

Even after the War of 1812, the federal government did not finance infrastructure improvements; state and local governments did.

History
1 answer:
Nitella [24]1 year ago
3 0

This is false.

My reasoning for this statement:

The time period in question is <u>after</u> the war of 1812, in 1816, at which point James Monroe was in charge of the <u>federal government</u> and signed a bill involving banks and therefore <u>funding the improvement of infrastructure</u>. The states and local governments were obviously affected but did not fund the change.

You might be interested in
I need help with this fast
vitfil [10]

I wasn't fast enough :[

3 0
3 years ago
Who is the president of USA in 2015
AlexFokin [52]

Barack Obama how did u not know


3 0
2 years ago
Which is these would be most impacted by rain acid rain falling in the Great Lakes region of Canada and the United States
WARRIOR [948]

The answer is B.water pollution would damage the fishing industry

6 0
3 years ago
What are making these Black Power groups so angry?
Elenna [48]

Answer:

For the first, I would say being poorly represented.

For the second, ignorance and morals.

Explanation:

A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.

It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.

3 0
2 years ago
In what time period did the shang dynasty exsist
yaroslaw [1]
1766-1122 BC or 1556-1046 BC. It depends on the source you go with.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please freaking help, I need these answer really badly
    11·2 answers
  • Which selection listed below occurs when police officers search all cars at a traffic checkpoint for contraband, whether or not
    13·2 answers
  • What was the negative side effect of Rome's expansion​
    9·2 answers
  • What Greek philosopher believed good conflict meant pursing the golden men
    8·1 answer
  • One reason hunters migrated further south then settling in the northmost part of America
    9·1 answer
  • Trade increased in eroupe because of the interest in eastern goods created by:
    10·1 answer
  • Name the two popular shrines in England and explain why people visited them.
    9·1 answer
  • What did Hitler learn from the response of other countries and the League of Nations which helped him in the future?
    13·1 answer
  • If you could choose a king or a queen to rule over America, who would it be?
    8·1 answer
  • Which factor caused many Irish immigrants to come to the United States in the 19th century?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!