Even after the War of 1812, the federal government did not finance infrastructure improvements; state and local governments did.

History

1 answer:

Nitella [24]1 year ago

3 0

This is false.

My reasoning for this statement:

The time period in question is <u>after</u> the war of 1812, in 1816, at which point James Monroe was in charge of the <u>federal government</u> and signed a bill involving banks and therefore <u>funding the improvement of infrastructure</u>. The states and local governments were obviously affected but did not fund the change.

You might be interested in

Eligible voters can vote for all of the following, EXCEPT __________. A. senators B. electors in the Electoral College C. suprem

lapo4ka [179]

C. Supreme Court justices

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

31. How can a citizen challenge a decision by the court?

Juliette [100K]

31. How can a citizen challenge a decision by the court?

7 0

3 years ago

How did Germany emerge from defeat in the First World War?

leonid [27]

Answer:

Germany emerged from the First World War defeated and in political and economic turmoil. The economy was ruined and the Kaiser had fled the country. The Weimar government, set up after the War, was having trouble controlling the country and was very unpopular for accepting the Treaty of Versailles

4 0

2 years ago

When did the spanish-american war take place? what was its origin? who helped drum up war fever in the us? what did the us gain

horsena [70]

The Spanish American war took place in the year of 1898. One of the leading causes of the war was the blowing up of USS <span>The Maine. In addition, the term yellow journalism used to refer to newspaper stories that may not be true but gain public appeal were growing, and it was causing some exaggeration of stories and Anti-Spanish propaganda. Leading figures of these newspapers are Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst. As a result of the war, the US annexed Puerto Rico, Guam, Philippines, and Hawaii. </span>

5 0

3 years ago

What was the three-fifths compromise? Question 16 options: A) A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when counting popu

12345 [234]

The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes. Option B is the answer.

<h3>What is Compromise agreement?</h3>

Compromise agreement was done between delegates from different state in 1787.

This is done between the Northern and the Southern states of the United States. The agreement is that three-fifths of the slave that were present in the country will be included in computing tax.

Therefore, The three-fifths compromise is that A slave would count as three-fifths of a person when paying taxes.

Learn more on compromise below

brainly.com/question/25668660

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago