1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sasho [114]
2 years ago
9

A firm using a(n) _______ essentially adopts a mass-market philosophy, viewing the market as one big market with no individual s

egments. a. individual targeting strategy b. undifferentiated targeting strategy c. niche targeting strategy d. concentrated targeting strategy
Business
1 answer:
snow_tiger [21]2 years ago
5 0

A company that uses an undifferentiated segmentation strategy adopts a mass market philosophy.

<h3 /><h3>What is undifferentiated marketing?</h3>

It is a strategy that consists of not performing market segmentation to sell your products and services, that is, it does not differentiate the different market niches, with every individual being a potential customer.

Therefore, in undifferentiated marketing, the company sees the market as a large market without individual segments.

Find out more about marketing here:

brainly.com/question/10229975

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Below is the complete list of accounts of Sooner Company and the related balance at the end of April. All accounts have their no
Cloud [144]

Answer:

Sooner Company

Trial Balance

For the month ended April 30, 202x

                                          Debit                 Credit

Cash                                $2,600

Accounts Receivable     $4,800

Prepaid Rent                   $6,100

Land                              $47,000

Accounts Payable                                      $3,000

Deferred Revenue                                      $1,650

Common Stock                                        $27,000

Retained Earnings                                    $19,750

Service Revenue                                      $24,100

Salaries Expense             $6,900

Supplies Expense             $8,100

Totals                              $75,500           $75,000

When you are preparing a trial balance, you must report the accounts with their normal balances, e.g. assets have a normal debit balance while equity has a normal credit balance.

6 0
3 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
True or False: The consequences of price ceilings are random, as the effects cannot be explained by the dynamics of the free mar
alexandr402 [8]
True because in Shanghai the equilibrium of the bees is much harder than the volume of the wasp in Kosovo
4 0
3 years ago
The benefit of saving some American jobs in specific industries protected from foreign competition Multiple Choice a. has risen
frutty [35]

Answer:

B. is much less than the costs to the whole American economy.

Explanation:

When foreign industries are prevented from entering the U.S. Market, the supply of the products that those foreign firms would provide is kept artificially low, in order to benefit domestic producers. This means that prices become more expensive than they should be, affecting all consumers.

For example, if the U.S. barred car imports from Japan, cars would become very expensive, and while the national car industry would benefit, the vast majority of consumers would be harmed by the higher prices.

7 0
4 years ago
Rule-of-thumb budgeting is budgeting that's popular with the hospitality and tourism industry because it's so effective.
a_sh-v [17]
I think the answer is false

:):):):):):):)
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or False: To get the best outcome while trying to reach a financial goal, you should estimate the cost of the goal and how
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following terms refers to the cost of changing direct materials into a finished manufactured product? a.factory ove
    15·1 answer
  • Money managers:
    7·1 answer
  • The crowding-out effect works through interest rates to: 
A. Increase the effectiveness of expansionary fiscal policy
B. Decreas
    7·1 answer
  • Oriental Corporation has gathered the following data on a proposed investment project: Investment in depreciable equipment $ 200
    14·1 answer
  • The next dividend payment by Hoffman, Inc., will be $2.80 per share. The dividends are anticipated to maintain a growth rate of
    7·2 answers
  • Nathalie is willing to apply for a car loan. She is 18 years old, still lives at home with her parents and has a part-time job d
    13·1 answer
  • Products A and B are joint products. Product A can be sold for $1,200 at the split-off point, or processed further at a cost of
    10·1 answer
  • A government announces it will impose an indirect tax on the price of petrol because it wants to discourage travel by car and en
    13·1 answer
  • Define “the feminization of poverty”? Explain and analyze why this condition is prevalent in global society?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!