I believed the answer is 4. It makes sense because, after the agricultural revolution, people switched from hunting and gathering to crops and needed necessary tools to do that. Number 1 doesn't really make sense because in the Classical Era, they created religions early, so it's not it. B doesn't really make sense and 3 is wrong because they still used animals.
Answer:
No, the Crusades weren’t justifiable. The Arab/Muslim conquest of the region centuries earlier wasn’t justifiable either. There were no good guys or bad guys in that conflict. Both sides were wrong.
From the perspective of Jews and Samaritans, it was really just two colonial powers (Crusaders and Arabs) fighting over a land that never rightfully belonged to either of them in the first place.
Explanation:
What is important today is to understand that the unjustified reaction of the Christian community to actions in the Holy Land can be compared to the reaction of people in the Muslim world to Western dominance. So, instead of something like the Crusades was seen as an acceptance by many Muslims of terrorism. If the Christian Crusades were bad, so is the Muslim acceptance for decades of terrorism, particularly towards Israeli civilians.
The answer to this question is <span> D. Transcendentalism
Transcendentalism emerged in the late 1820s from the intellectuals who constantly made an effort to find the truth about the universe.
This movement was heavily criticized by most people during that time that relied on what's written on religious scripture for understanding the universe. </span>
