The correct order are as follows:
3. Tessman shows Hedda the manuscript.
5. Brack relates the story of the night before.
1. Lovborg tells Thea he destroyed the manuscript.
2. Hedda gives Lovbory a gun.
4. Hedda burns the manuscript.
The events above are drawn from Hedda Gabler Act 3.
The act relays how Lovborg lost his manuscripts at a party, Tessman saw the manuscript and gave it to his wife, Hedda to keep. Lovborg came to Hedda house and lied to Thea that he destroyed the manuscript and this severed the relationship between them. After Thea left, Hedda gave a gun to Lovborg and proceeded to burn the manuscripts after Lovborg left.
Answer:
B) The categories are listed numerically and the order is randomly organized.
Explanation:
Rhythm is a patterned repetition of a motif, formal element, etc., at a regular or irregular intervals in the same or modified form.
Answer:
The author is really bias and on Clifford High School side, the actual facts are in the argument that happened.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
I believe school should not have clothing restrictions and let me tell you why .
I believe schools should not have rules of conduct regarding with clothing restrictions because one of many reasons .Firstly , numerous of kids in todayś society express their selves in clothing wear . The clothing can either vary from crop tops to easily being flip flops . However, we do have antagonists against this debation . Some people believe that clothing can be too revealing too others possibly even cause hazards as well . This debation puts a great argument in place .
Clothing wear is a expressive outlet too society today because it gives a chance for kids to be their selves . it is a fact that students who are against school uniforms argue that they lose their self-identity when they lose their right to express themselves through fashion. This proclaims the fact that kids can lose the ideal of expression because the school districts takes that away .
The other side of the argument believes that clothing can be hazardous or too revealing too others . In fact 1/3 school injuries have been caused by shoes not being sturdy enough . For example flip flops , and heels . This side does provide a good argument . However whoś side are you on ? who do you believe has a stronger argument.
This is all up for a debation , The argument still stands strong today. Do you believe that clothing restrictions should be lifted ? Or do you believe that they should be in use for protection of others ? You decide .
Explanation:
I hope I helped . I wrote this out of my own type . No plagrisim involved . I did it all on my own . You have a nice night or day . Xoxox.
