Answer: C
Explanation: From what I can remember from the story, the son of the man trying to escape warmed him not to fly so high and from his own pride, he fell. Also none of the other answers make sense because they relate to the story and questions like these should be based solely on a main idea or topic, the central focus.
Answer:
Chris had a premonition of what might happen
Explanation:
There is nowhere in the book that shows that Chris was suicidal or had a wish to die. He was downcast and unsure of his return because of his high unpreparedness for his adventure to the Alaskan wilderness. This is not the only dangerous event that Chris had undertaken, he only foresaw the danger in this coupled with his ineffective preparation for the journey.
"This is the last you shall hear from me Wayne. Arrived here 2 days ago. It was difficult to catch rides in the Yukon Territory. But I finally got here. Please return all mail I receive to the sender. It might be a very long time before I return south. If this adventure proves fatal and you don't ever hear from me again, I want you to know you're a great man. I now walk in the wild."
From this letter, we could see that Chris still saw a possibility of return, though slim. "It might be a very long time before I return south", this is enough evidence that he had no plan to kill himself, he only foresaw impending fatality in the adventure which may cause the wilderness to see his end.
The correct answer is C. Although Peterson's comments may have been valid at one time, his book is over 30 years old.
This sentence is challenging the credibility of Peterson's book because it is old. At one point, his arguments may have been correct, but this has certainly changed over time given that over 30 years have passed since he published his book. Now, there are newer opinions about the topic, so he isn't a credible source anymore.
Answer: A.)Decide what broad statement the data supports.
Explanation:
If you need to draw conclusions from the data presented on a table, you should look at the information presented and decide what broad statement that data seems to support. That would be your conclusion.
Option B is wrong because a certain degree of scepticism is needed rather than complete agreeableness. Option C is wrong because emotions do not allow for very good conclusions and option D would be correct except it would be difficult to evaluate the accuracy of the information displayed if no referent information is given.
Answer:
The plague broke out in London; the people ran away in panic. NO problem answering you correctly!!
