Answer:
$124,000 is the correct answer if we use 6% which is the correct question scenario. If we take 7% then its
Explanation:
The cash dividend announced is $160,000. Remember the first payment goes to preferred shareholders and then the amount left would be distributed among the ordinary shareholders.
The dividend share of Preferred shareholders = 6000 shares * $100 par value * 6% fixed rate = $36,000
After deducting this amount from the dividend announce will go to ordinary shareholders and is calculated as under:
Share of Dividend of ordinary shareholders = $160,000 - $36,000
= $124,000
Similarly if we use 7% fixed rate, then
The dividend share of Preferred shareholders = 6000 shares * $100 par value * 7% fixed rate = $42,000
After deducting this amount from the dividend announce will go to ordinary shareholders and is calculated as under:
Share of Dividend of ordinary shareholders = $160,000 - $42,000
= $124,000
Answer:
A. Dr. Office Supplies, $80; Dr. Merchandise inventory, $160; Dr. Miscellaneous expenses, $20; Dr. Cash over and short, $8; Cr. Petty cash, $268.
Explanation:
$80 for office supplies, $160 for merchandise inventory, and $20 for miscellaneous expenses are all expense accounts which need to be debited for settlement. Cash Shortage account is debited by $8 to record the cash shortage effect. The total of all these account will be credited in cash account.
The answer to this question is database management software
This type of software is usually designed to retrieve data, manage it, process it, and present it in a way to make materials duty become a lot esier.
This software will definitely increase the overall productivity in the workplace with lower cost in the long run.
When doing online research, you have to make sure that you are using credible source that present unbiased information. "Stop Killing the Polar Bears" seems to be an organization that will post biased information to persuade people to stop killing polar bears. Sites like this may post incorrect or incomplete information to make their case sound more appealing, but may not have the factual foundation to make them a credible source for research.
