Which two statements explain why the underlined text is a logical fallacy Architecture

English

1 answer:

polet [3.4K]2 years ago

7 0

The two statements that explain why the underlined text is a logical fallacy are:

It claims that "out with the old, in with the new' has caused people to stop loving antique architecture, without providing any evidence.
It makes an overly general statement about people.

<h3>What is a Logical Fallacy?</h3>

This refers to the faulty logic that is used in order to make a false premise that leads to an incorrect conclusion.

Hence, we can see that based on the fact that the complete text talks about the given narration between the narrator and the love for architecture that the people have, he does not provide evidence for his claims.

Read more about logical fallacies here:

brainly.com/question/4255659

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Short summary of the Poem ''The King's breakfast''

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

Hope this helps you.!!!!

8 0

3 years ago

That package was sent to Paris. Identify the phrase in bold.

Kaylis [27]

There is no phrase in bold

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

3. What god was the Athenian theatre focused on? What was he the god of?

melamori03 [73]

Athenian theatre honored mainly Dionysus, god of wine and partying.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What can be inferred from the sentences below in paragraph 7?

Jlenok [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What best explains why a written argument without translations might not work?

Tom [10]

Answer:

The relationship between ideas would lack the appropriate emphasis and logical flow. (The second option)

Explanation:

Transitions signal relationships between ideas. Basically, transitions provide the reader with directions for how to piece together the author's ideas into a logically coherent argument.

So transitions help readers understand the logic of how the writer's ideas fit together, and therefore, the answer is the second option.

5 0

3 years ago