Answer:
If a CPA does an audit irresponsibly, the CPA will be held liable to third parties who were recognized and not foreseeable to the CPA for gross negligence.
It needs to be specified if the third party had been “anticipatable,” liability; it may be recognized for ordinary negligence within a Rosenblum v. Adler decision.
Explanation:
Answer:
The value of the firm is $1,485,000
Explanation:
For computing the value of the firm, first, we have to compute the price per share which equals to
= Borrowed amount ÷ repurchase shares
= $220,000 ÷ 20,000
= $11 per share
Now, the value of the firm should be computed. The formula is used which is shown below:
= Price per share × Number of outstanding shares
= $11 × 135,000 shares
= $1,485,000
Hence, the value of the firm is $1,485,000
Answer:
b-the costs incurred to process the units to this point
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that the company want to decide whether to sell partially completed goods or should incurred extra cost in order to finished the goods and sells them as a completed unit
So there should be the decision regarding selling price for the units that are completed, the selling price for the units that are partially completed and the cost i.e to be incurred for finishing the units
Answer:
If both companies have the sames sales volume, total costs and income from operations, the reason why Gouda has a lower break even point is that their variable costs are lower. We use the contribution margin per unit to calculate the break even point and the contribution margin per unit = sales price - variable costs. The question states that total costs are equal, but it doesn't say anything about variable or fixed costs.
Assuming that Gouda is above break even point, each sale will generate a higher operating profit since the contribution margin is higher.
Explanation:
