Answer:
The type of recon that would allow me and my group know detailed information about the enemy activity, terrain, and certain specific civil considerations within a prescribed area. Is:
Area Recon patrol
Explanation:
All right here we go. Area recon patrol allows the recon/ scout/ intelligence unit to gather detailed information on the terrain or enemy activity within a prescribed area. This can be, rivers, woods, towns, hatches, etc. What matters here is to know the type of location, the conditions around it and how this information will provide a full context explanation to the patrol. This is a very basic tactical tool that changes the game in all situations.
<span>According to cognitive dissonance theory,there is a tendency for individuals to seek consistency among their cognitions like beliefs and opinions.when there is an inconsistency between attitudes or behaviours ,something must change to eliminate the dissonance.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
we can get the information about past by studying and collecting information about past and using the sources like manuscripts , inscriptions and archaeology.
Hope it helps:)
Answer:
a. certain types of cancers take twenty to thirty years to develop, and cell phone studies have only been monitoring this potential connection for ten years or less.
Explanation:
<u>This statement explains how we can't for the sure claim there are more benefits off the cell phone because the studies of the health effects have not been going on for long enough for us to prove that.</u>
<u>The damage is yet to be revealed, as stated in the claim, but it can be of great influence if proven that cell phones are connected to the development of cancer.</u>
<u>The B statement</u> does not add anything to the first claim and does not contradict it, as it just gives information about phone history usage and not the health benefits or risks.
<u>The C statement </u>is not counterclaiming as it adds up to the mentioned benefits - it explains how cell phones are helping life in general and do not refer to the statement about health risks.
<u>The D statement </u>mentions claims by agencies that are not health-based, and also supports the first statement, saying how there are no links to cancer development so far. It actually only goes with the original statement, and the A statement is counterclaim for it as well.
