If you eat at several Mexican restaurants and decide that Mexican food is hot, then you are technically using "inductive" reasoning, since this would be a "bottom to top" approach of reaching a conclusion.
No. Unfortunately I can not
Answer:
It caused no immediate boundary changes.
Explanation:
The main result of the war was two centuries of peace between the United States and Britain. ... American fears of the Native Americans ended, as did British plans to create a buffer Native American state.
<span>The correct answers are: 1)D The statement refers to a situation in which the rights of other people are interfered by the guilty party, who cannot plead innocence through the right of "freedom of speech", as it is relatively "inferior"or of no importance considering the transgression of others' rights.
It is not an example of absolute, natural rights nor of civil rights (although it is about freedom of speech, which is a civil right), since its focus is about the peculiar situation, regarding relative rights.
2)B Civil liberties are a protective form of freedoms, or "liberties" which cannot be touched by the government, without due process.
3)B The Constitution initially didn't have a bill of rights and this became a controversial issue, focusing on the necessity to limit the governement's power.</span>
I think and hope that this is the right answer to your question: The Atlantic slave trade WAS 1 OF THE MOST important examples of a forced human migration in history. While in the U.S. slavery was well-documented, so ONLY 10 % of the slaves that were imported from Africa came to the United States. The other 90 % were disbursed throughout the Americas. Nearly HALF went to Brazil alone.
Please don't judge if wrong I'm from Havana Cuba so I dun't now much.
