Well, "With patience and calm, even a burro can climb a palm." means <span>When you're patient you can do anything you set your mind to. But when you're angry/mad its harder to do a task. hope it helps :)</span>
2÷3=.6666666667 while 4÷7=.5714285714 so tina completed more homework before dinner
Hello. You didn't talk about what story this character belongs to, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I can help by telling you the deficition of a complex character. This will help you to recognize characteristics in this character that will lead you to be able to answer the question.
A complex character is one that in a credible and concrete way, manages to show himself as an individual with many layers who have different depths and complexities, leading this character to be a complex person, with several different traits, and may even seem contradictory, enigmatic and unpredictable. This character must reflect aspects inherent to human nature, difficult to understand and which require the use of the reader's reasoning and interpretation throughout the plot so that the character's actions are surprising and move reading.
Answer:
Banning books became accepted by the majority because books lost their value and people began to embrace new media, sports and adrenaline boosting forms of entertainment.
Explanation:
The book "Fahrenheit 451" is a dystopian novel by <em>Ray Bradbury</em> which is set in a society where books are outlawed and burned but eventually, one of the "firemen" Guy Montag does not believe in what he is doing anymore and decides to start preserving books instead.
It is revealed in the book that banning of books was accepted by the majority because they no longer had value for books and were more interested in fim and television and other forms of entertainment.
<span> "Ambush," O’Brien describes killing a man while serving in war. He had no intention of killing him—he reacted without thinking. O’Brien feels guilty about having killed another human being, even though his fellow soldier tries to soothe him with the logic that the man would have been killed eventually anyway. However, trying to justify having killed someone, O’Brien explains that his training as a soldier prompted him to act involuntarily when he lobbed the grenade upon spotting an enemy soldier. Twenty years later, long after the war has ended, O’Brien is unable to admit to his daughter, Kathleen, that he has killed another person. He feels guilt and denial about having killed a man, and experiences recurrent flashbacks and visions. Through his story, O’Brien conveys that a soldier is a changed person after he has witnessed such a war, and those who have not been in a war cannot begin to understand the emotional turmoil that soldiers go through.</span>
