Farther! Cuz the other options don't make sense grammatically.
Answer:
whom*
Explanation:
Whom is an objective pronoun that is used for formal English. It is used as the object of a verb or preposition. Whom should replace the object of the sentence. Consider who is having something done to them when finding the object of the sentence. The object is the person, place, or thing that something is being done to.
Who is used to provide more information about a person or people mentioned previously in a sentence. It is also a subjective pronoun. A subjective pronoun is a pronoun (I, me, he, she, etc.) that is used as the subject of the sentence. Who replaces the subject of the sentence.
Are you referring to someone who is doing something (who), or are you referring to someone who is having something done to them (whom)?
1. C. The paragraph gives a brief overview of mad cow disease.2. It's a site where anyone can modify the content. The wiki part of the address tells you this is true.3. The evidence supporting a claim about the benefits of water conservation. 4. Scientific American- it's a scholarly periodical.5. how to set up the yards... The last sentence in the passage introduces this part.6. evidence about the number of people killed during the Spanish flu pandemic.7. .com is the most unreliable as it's the least regulated.8. a fact about the drought9. Today's farm machines can milk more than 100 cows an hour. This fits best because it follows a sentence stating the the milking process is superior. This fact makes that seem true.
If I understand the question correctly, the negative is the "opposite," so here you could write a phrase with the opposite of each word:
The moon sets to the west.
Their philosophies are similar. Both movements were born as a reaction to strict traditions, laws and religious rules. They both opposed Calvinism. They both thought that an individual, as well as nature are important. No rules should be obeyed - both movements thought that.
