Answer:
Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General
Out of those three that is what the answer would be. But if you were to need the whole line it would be:
1. Vice President 2. Speaker of the House of Representatives 3. President Pro Tempore of the Senate 4. Secretary of State 5. Secretary of the Treasury 6. Secretary of Defense 7. Attorney General 8. Secretary of the Interior 9. Secretary of Agriculture 10. Secretary of Commerce 11. Secretary of Labor 12. Secretary of Health and Human Services 13. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 14. Secretary of Transportation 15. Secretary of Energy 16. Secretary of Education 17. Secretary of Veterans Affairs 18. Secretary of Homeland Security
Each reformer belongs to one of these groups.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The individuals who are considered to be idealists are the people who do not take practical things in their mind. They are more guided more by ideals and the values that they imbibe.
On the other hand, the people who are practical reformers are the people who give more importance to practical things in life. There fore they make changes in the society according to the practical experiences that they see in life.
Answer:
When I moved to Charlotte, NC, in 1986, I visited local museums to learn about the city. One museum caught my eye – the Levine Museum of the New South. Its permanent exhibit – Cotton Fields to Skyscrapers – “uses Charlotte and its 13 surrounding counties as a case study to illustrate the profound changes in the South since the Civil War.” The “New South” – a term Atlanta newspaperman Henry W. Grady coined in a speech to the New England Society of New York on December 21, 1886 – is familiar to many American history teachers. In his speech, Grady, the first southerner to speak to the Society, claimed that the old South, the South of slavery and secession, no longer existed and that southerners were happy to witness its demise. He refused to apologize for the South’s role in the Civil War, saying, “the South has nothing to take back.” Instead, the dominant theme of Grady’s speech, according to New South historian Edward L. Ayers, “was that the New South had built itself out of devastation without surrendering its self-respect.” Tragically, Grady and most of his fellow white southerners believed maintaining their self-respect required maintaining white supremacy.
Explanation:
Grady, then the 46-year-old editor-publisher of the Atlanta Constitution, was one of the leading advocates of the New South creed. In New York, he won over the crowd of prominent businessmen, including J.P. Morgan and H.M. Flagler, with tact and humor. He praised Abraham Lincoln, the end of slavery, and General William T. Sherman, whom he called “an able man” although a bit “careless with fire.” Grady reassured the northern businessmen that the South accepted her defeat. He was glad “that human slavery was swept forever from American soil” and the “American Union saved.” He urged northern investment in the South as a means of cementing the reunion of the war-torn nation. He claimed progress in racial reconciliation in the South and begged forbearance by the North as the South wrestled with “the problem” of African Americans’ presence in the South. Grady asked whether New England would allow “the prejudice of war to remain in the hearts of the conquerors when it has died in the hearts of the conquered?” Grady’s audience cheered his call for political and economic reunion – albeit at the cost of African American rights. The term “New South” was used in the 20th century to refer to other concepts. Moderate governors of the late 20th century – including Terry Sanford of North Carolina, Jimmy Carter of Georgia, and George W. Bush of Texas – were called New South governors because they combined pro-growth policies with so-called “moderate” views on race. Others used the phrase to summarize modernization in southern cities such as Charlotte, Atlanta, Richmond, and Birmingham, and the region’s increasing economic and demographic diversity. However, all uses of the term have suggested the intersection between economic development and racial justice in the South during Reconstruction, the Jim Crow Era, the Civil Rights Era and today.
During the Roman Empire, Jesus of Nazareth began preaching a message of affection and forgiveness. His lifestyles and teachings led to the rise of Christianity.
This religion had a awesome have an effect on at the Roman Empire and on people at some point of the sector. Over time, the Christian church and faith grew more organized. In 313 ad, the Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, which everyday Christianity: 10 years later, it had turn out to be the professional faith of the Roman Empire.
The movement that originated round Jesus must have suffered a traumatic setback with his demise. not a lot that a Messiah could not die, however that nothing happened. For some time we don't know what happened to the fans of Jesus. They apparently scattered, however not too long thereafter it seems that they got here to the conviction that some thing had happened. Something that did change their perspective on who Jesus was and what he could suggest for the destiny of the motion, and this is what we realize as the resurrection. Now it is not clear what happened within the resurrection. The resurrection story brings a different perspective to the information of Jesus. He's now someone vindicated, and it is really the perception in the resurrection revel in that leads the disciples to return to think of Jesus as by some means extra than only a prophet.
Learn more about The history of christianity here:-
brainly.com/question/510889
#SPJ9
