Answer:
all binding forms of dispute resolution
Explanation:
Resolution of disputes has 2 types of processes.
<u><em>Adjudicative processes</em></u>, such as litigation or arbitration, in which a judge, jury or arbitrator determines the outcome.
<u><em>Consensual processes, </em></u>such as collaborative law, mediation, conciliation, or negotiation, in which the parties attempt to reach agreement.
In both of the above processes the parties most bind to the final decision conceived.
Answer:
Probably not
Explanation:
To me I think they planed to give the money to you guys for it try and put a little more in the project. The most important part is if the client is happy about the advertisement.
As someone who has experienced different educational and professional environments, I believe that I can offer Meta's product teams a new perspective on how our products can be used to benefit everyone. I have seen firsthand how different people learn and work, and I believe that Meta's products can be designed to accommodate different learning and working styles.
It is also believed that Meta's products can be designed to be more accessible and user-friendly for people of all abilities. In addition, I have experience working with people from diverse educational backgrounds, and I believe that this experience can help me contribute to Meta's efforts to create products that are truly designed for all.
Learn more about education here: brainly.com/question/25887038
#SPJ4
Answer: d. employ less capital and more labor.
Explanation: Given the marginal product of labor equals 10 and a marginal product of capital equals 50, since the marginal product of capital is now considerably larger than that of labor, increasing labor should be prioritized at this point, because due to the marginal returns on capital may soon start to diminish especially with the high capital rate. And also, high capital rate of $100, which is considerably higher than the labor wage rate of $20, the firm should employ less capital and focus more on labor
Answer:
$3,750
Explanation:
at $25 per sheet of plywood:
total demand = 800 - (10 x 25) = 800 - 250 = 550
total supply = (50 x 25) - 1,000 = 1,250 - 1,000 = 250
the equilibrium price is:
800 - 10P₁ = 50P₁ - 1,000
1,800 = 60P₁
P₁ = 1,800 / 60 = 30
the equilibrium quantity (Q₁) is:
Q₁ = 800 - (10 x 30) = 800 - 300 = 500
at 250 units, the price should be:
250 = 800 - 10P₂
10P₂ = 550
P₂ = $55
total deadweight loss = 0.5 x (P₂ - P₁) x (Q₂ - Q₁) = 0.5 x ($55 - $25) x (250 - 500) = 0.5 x $30 x -250 = -$3,750