1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bezimeni [28]
4 years ago
9

Why should people be cautious in making claims that northern victory was a foregone conclusion

History
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]4 years ago
3 0
<span>It took three years before the north finally put Grant's plans in to full action. Between 1861 and 1864 the South had a decent opportunity to force the Union to surrender. The Union did, in fact, lose many battles during the first two years so the Union losing the war was not unheard of. While the North believed the had God on their side because they were ending slavery, for men who were simply enlisted and made to fight, there was little motivation for them to win the war. Once the slaves were free, they would have more people to compete with them for jobs and money was scarce for some of these people. Those fighting for the Confederacy were fighting for their hearts and way of life, they believed they were fighting for their very freedom, which meant those in the south were likely to fight much harder than those in the north.</span>
You might be interested in
What caused the Mexican civil war to finally come to a end in 1920
mafiozo [28]
I mean you cant google it and find the answer cmon
5 0
3 years ago
What is apartheid in the Imperialism Illustrated?
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

Apartheid was a system of institutionalised racial segregation that existed in South Africa and ... Although Verwoerd tried to bond these different blocs, the subsequent voting illustrated only a minor swell of support, indicating that a great many .

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
45 POINTS
kompoz [17]

Answer:give them all $ (x axis) 5% of Colony f3+d4=h5

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe u.s. policy toward Iraq during bill Clinton’s presidency
Jet001 [13]

Answer:

U.S. policy toward the region of the Persian Gulf has changed more and more often over the years more than any other foreign policy I can think of. Current U.S. policy can be traced back more than half a century. This said, the most useful place to begin to understand how we arrived where we are today is to return to the late 1960s, when Great Britain decided it could no longer sustain its commitments east of Suez.

Explanation:

Changes

5 0
3 years ago
What were Adam Smith's 3 natural laws of economics?
Oliga [24]
1) The law of self interest - when people work for themselves and their own good
2) The law of competition - people make better products because of competition
3) The law of supply and demand - enough goods would be produced or supplied at the lowest price to meet the demand in a market
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are totalitarian governments often controlled by a single political party
    7·1 answer
  • What were the major causes of the demographic shift westward in America in the late<br> 1800s?
    14·1 answer
  • What effect did the shift in population have on American politics?
    13·1 answer
  • Modernization has changed the role of religion in societies around the world
    10·1 answer
  • Which population is unable to read?<br><br> Dutch Reformed<br> Indians<br> Hindustani<br> whites
    10·1 answer
  • How do you describe a great composer
    8·1 answer
  • How did Natural Rights Theory influence the English colonists in America?
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement describes China? 30 points question, pls hurry
    12·1 answer
  • Which describes a characteristic of civilization?
    11·1 answer
  • What were the main ideas of the Declaration of the Rights of man and citizens
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!