All categories

2 years ago

A homeowner from State A hired a contractor from State B to build a vacation home for her in State C. The parties signe

1 answer:

5 0

The following facts is most relevant to the court's decision on the homeowner's motion : The contractor removed the case to the federal court for State A.

INTERPRETATION-

The commencement of the action in State A is most relevant. When a case is removed from state court to federal court, venue is set in the federal district court that embraces the state court in which the action was pending, making the federal district court of State A the only appropriate venue choice.

Thus, (C) is the correct answer because the most (indeed, only) relevant fact is the fact that the action was commenced in a court of State A.

In answer choice (B)

Unlike cases commenced in federal court, in cases removed to federal court, the residence of the defendant contractor.

In answer choices (A) and (D)

The place where a substantial part of events relating to the claim occurred are irrelevant.

Therefore we can conclude that the correct choice is C.

Your question is incomplete, but most probably your full question was:

A homeowner from State A hired a contractor from State B to build a vacation home for her in State C:

A. The parties signed the contract in State A.

B. The contractor breached the contract, and the homeowner sued the contractor in a court of State A, seeking damages of $100,000.

C. The contractor removed the case to the federal court for State A.

D. The homeowner promptly moved to remand the case to state court, arguing that venue was improper.

Which of the following facts is most relevant to the court's decision on the homeowner's motion?

Learn more about Federal Court's Decision on:

brainly.com/question/10051092

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

To assess risk and return involved in a purchase decision, which practical questions should a potential buyer ask? Check all tha

vaieri [72.5K]

I believe the answer is:

- What can go wrong?
This question is asked to find out the potential risk that may occur after purchasing the product.

- What is the likely return?
This question is asked to find out potential benefit from consuming the product

-Is the risk worth the return?
The purchase should be made only if the potential benefit would outweigh potential risk

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Grand Energy Corporation (GE) plans to issue bonds to raise $190 million. GE's investment banker will charge 5 percent of the to

Pavlova-9 [17]

The number of bonds that GE must sell to net $190 million after flotation costs is 200,000 bonds.

<h3>Number of bonds</h3>

First step is to calculate the amount issue

Net proceeds = Amount of issue x (1 - Flotation costs)

$190,000,000 = Amount of issue x (1 - 0.05)

Amount of issue = $190,000,000/0.95

Amount of issue= $200,000,000

Second step is to calculate number of bonds

Number of bonds = $200,000,000/$1,000

Number of bonds= 200,000 bonds

Inconclusion the number of bonds that GE must sell to net $190 million after flotation costs is 200,000 bonds.

Learn more about bonds here:brainly.com/question/25596583

7 0

2 years ago

Most people would rather give up their tvs or the internet than their mobile phones.

12345 [234]

ANSWER – TRUE

Most people would rather do away with their TVs or the Internet than their mobile phones. While for a fact, television remains the most used media, and the internet is fast catching up, surveys have shown that most people would still prefer to hold on to their mobile phones above these two.

5 0

3 years ago

The management of Wengel Corporation is considering dropping product B90D. Data from the company's accounting system appear belo

slamgirl [31]

Answer:

Net loss of $24,600

Explanation:

Sales $773,900

Variable Expenses ($402,100)

Contribution Margin $371,800

Avoidable Expenses of B90D

Fixed Manufacturing Expenses $186,000

Fixed Selling and Admin Expenses %161,200

Total Avoidable expenses $347,200

If the product B90D is discontinued,the contribution margin of $371,800 will be lost by Wengel corporation and costs of $347,200 will be saved.

Therefore there will be net loss of $(371,800-347,200) $24,600 to the company if the product is discontinued.

3 0

3 years ago

Bluefield Corp. has two product lines, A and B. Bluefield has identified the following information about its overhead and potent

Triss [41]

Answer:

Overhead assigned to product labour hours

Product A = $36.5 per hour × 76%× 1900= 52,706.0

Product B = $36.5 per hour × 24%× 1900= 16,644.0

Overhead assigned to product using machine hours

Product A = $1.54 × 17,700= $27,258

Product B = $1.54 × 27,300 =$42,042

Explanation:

Under the traditional absorption costing system, overhead is assigned to units produced using the direct labour hours or machine hours basis.

Overhead absorption rate = Budgeted overhead for the period/Budgeted labour hours

OAR = $69,300 /1,900 hours

= $36.5 per hour

Overhead assigned to product

Product A = $36.5 per hour × 76%× 1900= 52,706.0

Product B = $36.5 per hour × 24%× 1900= 16,644.0

Overhead absorption rate = Budgeted overhead for the period/Budgeted machine hours

OAR = $69,300 /45,000 hours= $1.54 per hour

Overhead assigned to product

Product A = $1.54 × 17,700= $27,258

Product B = $1.54 × 27,300 =$42,042

4 0

3 years ago