Answer:
No.
Explanation:
No. It did not pick the cotton, instead it just separated seeds and fibers. It didn't reduce the need for slave labor, or picking by hand.
Evidence: Link on HistoryPlex, won't provide here.
The AIDS epidemic as well as the widespread usage of drugs.
Answer: (B.) The militias led raids into Indian territory that destroyed their cops and their towns on the eastern side of the mountains, mostly ending their attacks
Explanation:
I took the test, Hope I helped ;)
The settlement had negative results for Native Americans. Despite the fact that Native American tribes did every so often shape positive associations with European pilgrims, changeless European settlement in America, in the end, prompted sickness and removal. Local Americans had no insusceptibility to European ailments and their populace was crushed by the presentation of sicknesses like smallpox. After some time, most surviving tribes were persuasively migrated from their conventional grounds to clear a path for extending European settlements.
Lincoln's 1857 Emancipation Proclamation warned that the issue of slavery could destroy the nation.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
This proclamation was given by Abraham Lincoln when the civil war was in its third year. The proclamation changed the status of almost 3.5 million slaves. The slaves were freed post the proclamation.
Slavery was a major issue that had led to the civil war and this proclamation changed the manner in which slavery was viewed.
The proclamation made freeing the slaves an explicit goal of the war. The proclamation did not lead to immediate abolition of slavery but ensured that most of the slaves in the Union were freed.