Similarities :
(1) The source of both the religion is vedic religion and both and indebted to Upanishads
(2) Both Gautam Buddha and Mahavir belonged to princely families and not to priestly families.
Dis-similarities :
(1) Difference regarding conception Moksha :
According to Buddhism, a man attains Moksha when he ends all the desires and can attain it while living in the world. But according, to Jainism Moksha is freedom from miseries and can be attained only after death.
(2) Means of attainment of Moksha:
According to Buddhist Sangha is proper for attainment of Moksha and they hate self-mortifications and severe penances. Jainism believes in fasts and severest penances.
Most tranquilizers used to reduce the experience of fear associated with anxiety work by <u>acting on</u> the effects of <u>the</u><u> </u><u>GABA neurotransmitter</u>.
Tranquilizers work by improving the movement of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which inhibits tension via reducing positive nerve-impulse transmissions inside the mind.
γ-Aminobutyric acid, or GABA, is the chief inhibitory neurotransmitter in the developmentally mature mammalian vital apprehensive system. Its main role is to reduce neuronal excitability during the apprehensive machine. GABA is sold as a dietary supplement in many countries.
Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an amino acid that functions because of the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter for the imperative apprehensive gadget (CNS). It has the capability to reduce neuronal excitability by inhibiting nerve transmission.
Learn more about Gamma-aminobutyric acid here brainly.com/question/4981705
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
