1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
n200080 [17]
1 year ago
13

In 2018, Joshua gave $15,000 worth of XYZ stock to his son. In 2019, the XYZ shares are worth $25,000. If Joshua had not given h

is son the stock in 2018 and held onto it instead, how much more would his estate have been worth than if he had made the gift
Business
1 answer:
Nata [24]1 year ago
5 0

Joshua will not be responsible for paying any gift tax since the value of the share is precisely 15,000. In the year 2019, each share is worth a total of $25,000.00. Because there is no tax on gifts, the value of Joshua's inheritance would have been increased by $25,000 if he had not given the stock to his son in 2018, but instead kept it for himself. This is further explained below.

<h3>What is Internal Revenue Service?</h3>

Generally, The Internal Revenue Service is in charge of collecting taxes for the country and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code that Congress passed.

In conclusion, It has come to light that Joshua made a gift of XYZ shares worth $15,000 to his kid during the year 2018. This is regarded as a gift and hence may be subject to gift taxation. On the other hand, the Internal Revenue Service will not tax any gifts up to the value of $15,000 given in 2018.

Read more about Internal Revenue Service

brainly.com/question/14308556

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Variable manufacturing overhead incurred was $245,000. Fixed manufacturing overhead incurred was $373,000. Actual machine-hours
steposvetlana [31]

Before information shows is the correct and complete question.

The Lopez Company use a standard costing in its manufacturing plant for the auto part. The standard cost of particular auto part based on a denominator level of a 4.000 output unit per year. included 6 machine-hours of variable manufacturing overhead at $8 per hour and 6 machine-hours of fixed manufacturing overhead at $15 per hour.

Actual output produced was 4.400 units.

Variable manufacturing overhead incurred was $245.000.

Fixed manufacturing overhead incurred was $373.000.

Actual machine-hours were 28.400.

Prepare the analysis of all variable manufacturing overhead and fixed manufacturing overhead variances.

Additional diagram attached to this question is displayed in the first image below.

Answer:

Explanation:

By using a columnar method, the analysis of all the variance & fixed manufacturing overhead varaince can be computed as follows:

Variable manufacturing overhead analysis:

Actual cost Incurred: ║ Actual input ×  Budgeted ║ Allocated: Budgeted

Actual input × Actual     rate                                        Input for actual output

rate                                                                               × Budgeted rate

245000                         28400×$8.00 = 227200      (4400×6hrs×$8)

                                                                                      = 211,200

                17800 U                    16800  U

            Spending Variance      Efficiency Variance

                                      33800 U

                                Flexible Budget Variance

Hence;

The spending Variance = $17,800 U

Efficiency Variance  = $16,000 U

Flexible Budget Varaince = $33800 U

where;   F = Favourable  & U = Unfavourable

<u>For the fixed Manufacturing Overhead:</u>

Actual cost Incurred: ║ Flexible Budget Lump ║ Allocated: Budgeted

Actual input × Actual     sum regardless of the    Input for actual output

rate                                 output level                     × Budgeted rate

                                                                             

373000                        4000×6hrs×15 = 360000  (4400×6hrs×$15)

                                                                                      = 396000

13000 U                                   36000  F

Spending Variance/               Production-Volume

Flexible budgeted variance   Variance

                                                 23000 F

                                        Over allocated fixed

                                        Overhead

Hence;

The spending Variance = $13000 U

The production Volume Variance  = $36,000 F

Over allocated fixed overhead = $23000 F

where;   F = Favourable  & U = Unfavourable

NOTE: To have a better view of the above computation in a table format, refer to the second and the third diagram in the image below.

8 0
2 years ago
A company decides to close down its plastics division. It has on hand 20 tons of styrene monomer, a raw material that has a mark
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

$16,000

Explanation:

With regards to the above information, we are only concerned with calculating the value of 20 tons of styrene to the company, hence other information are not relevant.

The total value of the 20 tons of styrene monomer to the company would be ;

= 20 tons of styrene monomer × Market price of styrene monomer per ton

= 20 × $800

= $16,000

6 0
2 years ago
In the recent past, the government has attempted to stimulate the economy by sending tax refunds to individual people so that th
blondinia [14]

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question will be "Consumption".

Explanation:

Investments, welfare spending, consumer spending are essential elements of GDP. That tells them what a nation is doing well. For every year, GDP is the world's total economic production.

Expenditure on resources consumption includes:

  • Durable goods (Furniture, cars, etc).
  • Non-durable goods (Oils. clothing, etc).
  • Services (Education, health, etc).

Therefore, it's the right answer.

3 0
2 years ago
A population of wild horses has a growth rate (r) of 0.2 per year. If the population starts out with 50 individuals and there is
777dan777 [17]
The answer to this question is e
7 0
2 years ago
The production supervisor at Elmwood Foods is known for being unduly critical of his subordinates' work performance. Which of th
MrRa [10]

Answer:

The correct answer is D) strictness .

Explanation:

A rigorous boss demands more than what employees can give, he is a perfectionist, he criticizes in a destructive way. This behavior is very clearly explained by Douglas McGregor in his theory X, where he mentions that this type of managers consider people simply as a means of production and that they are only moved by the salary they earn, that they do not enjoy their work and that they are for lazy nature.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the primary function of financial institutions in the economy?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is correct with respect to a limited partnership?
    6·1 answer
  • Eccles Inc. Eccles Inc., a zero growth firm, has an expected EBIT of $100,000 and a corporate tax rate of 30%. Eccles uses $500,
    15·1 answer
  • You wish to retire in 10 years, at which time you want to have accumulated enough money to receive an annual annuity of $13,000
    13·1 answer
  • Which poet, who seems be using iambic pentameter, bends the meter most?
    10·1 answer
  • your manager asks you to "cook the books" to support a loan application at the local bank. The manager insists it is a one-time
    11·1 answer
  • a granary allocates the cost of unprocessed wheat to the production of feed flour and starch 100000. how much of the 120000 cost
    7·1 answer
  • Plz help I will make u brainleist!!four points difference between engineering and architecture​
    9·1 answer
  • The opportunity cost of earning an advanced college degree is that:
    12·2 answers
  • Pronghorn Corporation shipped $20,800 of merchandise on consignment to Gooch Company. Pronghorn paid freight costs of $2,200. Go
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!