Characteristically, Command Economies are bad when it comes
to a person interested in making a profit; this is because they
typically center on economic equality and do not have economic efficiency. Speaking
in general, in a command economy, the allocation of resources is done by a
Central Planning Committee, and this system usually leads to quite a number of
shortages and/or surpluses in products since the demand/supply can be impulsive.<span> On the other hand, Market Economies are centered on profit-making
and Economic Efficiency.</span>
<span>
</span>
Essentially, how well resources are distributed among the
public will determine how well people will be rewarded. Let’s take for instance,
a parking lot like downtown; characteristically, a market economy will likely focus
on how to place as many cars as possible in the lot and how to use the space to
its full capacity, while a Command will most likely try to apportion the space
so that (just for example) 3 small, 3 medium and 3 large vehicles are parked (economic
equality).
<span>
<span>Finally, with a market economy, there is likely to
to be less shortages and less surpluses, since it works with the Law of Supply
and Demand in which an equilibrium price will be automatically established
through buying and selling.</span></span>
False only two sides are congruent
Answer:
A - Pacific plate
B - North American plate
C - African plate
D - Eurasian plate
Explanation:
Plate tectonics theory explained the plate movement and evolution from 65 million years ago which is pre cambrian era. There were seven major plates in the world such as Pacific plate, North American plate, South American plate, Eurasian plate, African plate, Indo Australian plate and Antartic plate. There were three movements in the plate such as Convergence plate boundary, divergence plate boundary and Transform plate boundary. Pacific plate is biggest plate among all.
