Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
Answer:
Representation.
State vs. Federal Powers. ...
Executive Power. General George Washington (MVLA) ...
Slavery. Though the word "slavery" does not appear in the Constitution, the issue was central to the debates over commerce and representation. ...
Commerce.
Have great day!
Answer:
NISEI
Explanation:
it is a term for the children of Japanese immigrants, originating from the Japanese language term for "second generation." In the American context, the term is generally understood to apply specifically to the American-born—and thus U.S. citizen—children of Japanese immigrants who arrived prior to the cessation of Japanese immigration to the U.S
False
Mann I miss music class.
<span>Sherman Antitrust Act reflected Congress's
desire to lessen or limit the ability of big businesses to dominate the
economy, its purpose was to limit not entirely end the ability. The Congress
justified its passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act on the grounds of its power
given by the constitution to regulate the commerce between various states. </span>
