1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
steposvetlana [31]
2 years ago
6

Which term best describes government in Russia after the Communists took power?

History
2 answers:
ehidna [41]2 years ago
5 0

The single-party was the party system used by the Russia government after the Communists took power.

<h3>What is a single-party?</h3>

This is a practice of a state where only one political party has the right to form the government based on the constitution provision.

Hence, after the Communists took power, the constitution allows only for  single-party to be used by the Russia government.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about single-party

<em>brainly.com/question/10467613</em>

#SPJ1

wlad13 [49]2 years ago
5 0

After the Communists won control in Russia, the government employed a single-party system. Option C.

<h3>What exactly is a single-party system.?</h3>

This is a constitutionally mandated process in states where only one political party is allowed to form the government.

In conclusion, After the Communists assumed control, Russia's constitution only permits the use of a single-party administration.

Here are some additional details concerning single-party politics.

brainly.com/question/1082704

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What do you think the father meant when he said, "Children be still"?​
Helen [10]

Answer:

maybe be attentive and stay where you are because i think fathers dont like childers if they are roaming around. Hope this helps. Can u give me brainliest

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
What was William Johnson's view of American Indians? American Indians are more complex and dangerous than most Europeans realize
fredd [130]

Answer:AS THE TITLE STATES, this essay will look closely at Johnson's role in the colonial development of America, and particularly the key concern over westward expansion. This became fundamentally linked with the differing views the British government and the colonial authorities held, over how this expansion should be managed, and in particular the financial cost of such a policy. This led, inexorably it seems, to the wider issues that then escalated into the Revolution and the fight for independence. Although Johnson died before the Revolution actually started, he was a key participant in the events that led up to this break with Britain, and as such the motives and actions of this man can give a picture of how the colonies and Britain viewed the future of America. This essay will look briefly at his early life in America, and then in more detail at the military and political career of Johnson, and particularly his involvement with the Indians, in his capacity as Superintendent of Indian Affairs, which was central to the British concerns over colonial expansion, and how that was to be managed. The military career of Johnson naturally evolved around his relationship with the Indians, especially the Six Nations, and earned him great success and wealth, after his victories at Lake George and Niagara. His political career progressed alongside his military one, and again was linked to his relationship with the Indians, through his appointment as Indian Superintendent. His relationship with the authorities in London, the colonial authorities, the settlers and traders, and with the Indians themselves, will be examined to form a portrait of Johnson, and how he saw the situation regarding westward expansion and all its implications for Britain and his adopted country, America. Finally some conclusions will be given based on Johnson'sSir William Johnson

circa 1751

AT THE AGE OF TWENTY-THREE Johnson left Ireland to seek his own way in America. He was aided by his uncle, Peter Warren, and went to the colonies with others who had decided to start afresh in the New World. Johnson's ability to get along with people and motivate them was rewarded soon after he arrived: in 1738 he had taken twelve families over to settle on his uncle's land in the Mohawk River valley; by 1742 there were twenty-six leases in operation. Johnson became a merchant, dealing and trading with the Indians, and building up, through trust and goodwill, the relationship that was to be the focal point of his life in America and also the main contributor to his subsequent fame and success. He bought his own land, across the river from his uncle's property, and continued to expand his business interests, which were mainly concerned with the fur trade and supplying the settlers in the Mohawk valley. This business gave Johnson the opportunity to understand the Indians: it was his special relationship with the Six Nations, and specifically with the Mohawks of the Iroquois Confederacy, that led him into the political and military arenas, and was to influence his subsequent ideas of how the colonies should manage the whole question of trade and expansion. This quality was early on recognised by the political leaders of the two colonies Johnson was primarily concerned with - Massachusetts and New York. In 1746 Governor Clinton of New York gave Johnson the task of supplying the vital garrison at Oswego. In the same year Johnson was appointed Commissary for Indian Affairs. Governor Shirley also saw Johnson's ability in dealing with the Indians; in 1754 he wrote to Johnson stating he would recommend him to be appointed in the capacity best suited to his talent. The result was that in 1755 Johnson received a warrant of appointment as Superintendent of Indian Affairs, with full powers to treat with the Confederate Nations in the British interest, from the Commander - in - Chief, Major General Braddock. AS WELL AS THIS POLITICAL ROLE Johnson had acquired a military handling of his difficult task, and how this affected subsequent events. One also.

Explanation: Read this and you'll get your answer~

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
16. What is the Theory of Mercantilism? *
Oliga [24]

Answer:

Mercantilism was an economic system of trade that spanned from the 16th century to the 18th century. Mercantilism was based on the idea that a nation's wealth and power were best served by increasing exports and so involved increasing trade.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
What is a stock share?
vova2212 [387]
Stock of a corporation, is all of the shares into which ownership of the corporation is divided. In American English, the shares are collectively known as "stock". A single share of the stock represents fractional ownership of the corporation in proportion to the total number of shares.
7 0
2 years ago
6. Why is the Bessemer Process so important to the growth of America?
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

The Bessemer Process Helped Build Great Steel That Would Later Be Used To Make Railroads, And Railroads Was A Good Source Of Transportation Of Goods, People, And Etc Across The United States.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was it easier for the Church to side with Galileo in 1992 than in 1633?
    8·1 answer
  • Government has 4 major purposes, of the 4, which do you think is most important and why do you think this?
    5·1 answer
  • Tsar Nicholas II enraged the russian people by
    6·1 answer
  • List two events that happened after the American Revolution
    13·1 answer
  • A result of the colonists’ angry reaction to the Tea Act of 1773 was that the British Parliament banned the sale of tea. repeale
    15·2 answers
  • Before the scientific revolution, europeans seeking to explain the workings of the universe would most likely have relied upon w
    14·1 answer
  • How did Pericles die
    6·1 answer
  • What are constitutionally guaranteed protections against the abuse of government power? A. civil rights B. civil liberties C. pr
    13·2 answers
  • This was the last addition to the Constitution before it was ratified.
    11·1 answer
  • ______ allows Congress to exercise powers that are not listed in the constitution 1)article 1, section 1 2)The "necessary and pr
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!