Fish are the most primitive seems reasonable to me
I'm confused on your question. Were 8 men randomly selected. Or 8 men randomly selected from "Football Fantasy XIV". In that case it would be all of them. But using 8 men*.65= 5.2. So it's gotta be 5 outta 8 men who think they be all knowing in fantasy football. I'm sorry lol I was confused I hoped I helped. Have a good day.
Answer:
Well u need to think hard next time
Explanation:
Had Richard Donner completed the Superman sequel back in 1979, it very likely would have been a better film than what Lester ultimately made but 2006's The Donner Cut is simply the best one could do 26 years later. It's also a bit jarring to see test footage in the middle of a movie.
Computer programmer Gus Gorman (Richard Pryor) is hired by financial tycoon Ross Webster (Robert Vaughn) to seize control of a weather satellite and annihilate Colombia's coffee crop. When Superman (Christopher Reeve) manages to thwart the plan, Webster commands Gorman to use the satellite to locate kryptonite, the Man of Steel's mortal weakness. But a missing unknown element in the kryptonite replaced by Gorman with tar causes an unintended side effect when presented to Superman.
It's called ghost fishing when fishermen dump their fishing nets.
<h3>What is
ghost fishing?</h3>
Ghost fishing can be defined as a situation in which a fisherman decides to abandon or dump his fishing gears. Also, it could sometime be as a result of his fishing gears such as nets.
This ultimately implies that, ghost fishing is a terminology which describes a situation in which fishermen dump their fishing nets.
Read more on ghost fishing here: brainly.com/question/9471884
#SPJ1
Hamilton thinks judges should be appointed permanently rather than on a periodic basis because periodic appointments would destroy a judge’s independence.
Alexander Hamilton was an American revolutionary. He was also a statesman and the Founding Father of the United States. He played a key role in promotion and interpretation of the constitution.
Permanent appointments would help to regulate more as well ensure greater independence of the judge.
Periodic appointment on the other hand would destroy a judge independence as he/she can be transferred or impeached anytime that fosters insecurity and lack of motivation to work.
Thus, permanent appointments is the only option.
To learn more about judges here
brainly.com/question/1059156
#SPJ4
