Answer:
Manuel can't go on a trip this fall because twenty-five dollars aren't enough to buy gas for the trip.
Explanation:
According to the subject-verb agreement, the subject and verb must agree in number.
The sentence <em>Manuel can't go on a trip this fall because twenty-five dollars aren't enough to buy gas for the trip</em>. is incorrect, as singular verbs should be used with specific amounts of money, even if plural words or symbols for currency are present. This is what this sentence would look like corrected:
<em>Manuel can't go on a trip this fall because twenty-five dollars</em><em> </em><em><u>isn't</u></em><em> </em><em>enough to buy gas for the trip.</em>
<em />
Another example of this rule: <em>Today, $5,000 </em><u><em>was</em></u><em> raised for the local animal shelter.</em> (Instead of <em>$5,000 were…</em>)
Answer:
i thinks its dependent clause.
Explanation:
The sentence “After the rain stopped, we went out on our bikes” contains two clauses: “the rain stopped” and “we went out on our bikes.” The subjects rain and we are given something to do, thereby completing the idea. By definition, a dependent clause does not form a simple sentence by itself.
pls mark brainliest
hope you have a great day and remember you are pretty snowflake and god loves u:))))
Answer:
B. blamed each other for breaking
Explanation:
While accused could work in this case, you generally would use "of" after it, not "for". Here's what it would look like if you were to use it in this sentence: "The two children accused each other <u>of</u> breaking the window." (See the difference?)
Hope this helps :)
Human rights-
Freedom of speech
Free will
Free choice of work
Free choice of education