The given statement is False. Baker, Schultz, and Halstead argue that the United States can reap significant strategic and economic benefits by investing in cleaner energy technologies and supporting international efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
Carbon emissions are the primary cause of global climate change. It is widely acknowledged that in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change, the world must urgently reduce emissions. However, how this responsibility is distributed among regions, countries, and individuals has long been a source of contention in international discussions.
This debate stems from the various ways emissions are compared, including annual emissions by country, emissions per person, historical contributions, and whether or not they account for traded goods and services. These metrics can tell a variety of stories.
To know more about carbon emissions here-
brainly.com/question/1301348
#SPJ4
To take revenge for not allowing him to take up the living.
To mark the new year in ecuador, effigies are destroyed by burning them on the street
For better understanding let's explain what the statement means
- Effigy is commonly known as a primitive or simply representation of someone a person may hate or disliked and this is often destroyed in public view
- In Ecuador, effigies of individuals the people of Ecuador hates or disliked are taking to open places such as street and the burnt.
From the above we can therefore say that the answer to mark the new year in ecuador, effigies are destroyed by burning them on the street is correct
Learn more from
brainly.com/question/5339595