Answer:
Your opportunity cost of attending a game compared with the opportunity cost facing a college student 10 years ago is:
A) higher, because more games are televised today.
Opportunity costs are the cost of choosing one alternative from another.
In this case, when college students attend college football games they are unable to do other activities, not only while they are at the stadium or going to the stadium, but they are not able to purchase other goods. The cost of those alternatives that are lost are higher now because many college football games are televised now, before if you wanted to see a game you had to go to the game. So a student is now able to watch the game while doing other activities, or saving money for buying something else.
Can this change in opportunity cost account for the decline in college football attendance?
B) Yes, because these changes increase the opportunity cost of watching football games in person.
Even though opportunity costs do not involve actual cash payments, they are still important and individuals do consider them when they are choose one option over another. E.g. imagine if you had to choose between spending a considerable amount of money by attending a game (ticket, gas, beverages, etc.) or watching that game on TV and buying a few clothes instead or going on a date, etc. What option would you choose?
2016 may 1 Debit Notes Receivable $5,300
Credit Accounts Receivable $5,300
2016 dec 31 Debit Interest Receivable $106
Credit Interest Income $106
2017 may 1 Debit Cash $5,459
Credit Notes Receivable $5,300
Credit Interest Receivable $159
In the scenario in which each parent has just one child who watches sesame street, each parent has a private incentive to contribute 0% during the pledge drive. Public television is nonexcludable, which means that the free-rider problem will emerge, so every parent has an incentive to not contribute in hopes that others will. This is the reason for the 0%.
Answer:
a. buyers of the good will bear most of the burden of the tax.
Explanation:
When a tax is imposed on a good for which the supply is relatively elastic and the demand is relatively inelastic, buyers or consumers of the good will bear most of the burden of the tax.
However, when tax is imposed on a good whose supply is relatively inelastic and the demand for the goods is relatively elastic, the producers or sellers would be responsible for the tax burden of the goods.
Generally, tax revenues are larger with respect to the inelasticity of demand and supply.
Answer:
the right answer is A.
Explanation:
because Those responsible for ensuring the health and safety of their workers are the professionals who study the regulation of these standards
