Quality information is an organized set of relevant data that can be used for various purposes.
Quality information is made up of a group of data already supervised and ordered, which serve to build a message based on a certain phenomenon or entity.
- It allows solving problems and making decisions, since its rational use is the basis of knowledge.
- It is a resource that gives meaning to reality, through codes and data sets.
Therefore, we can conclude that quality information is the set of data, already processed and ordered for understanding, that provide new knowledge that can be used for different purposes.
Learn more about quality information here: brainly.com/question/8197747
Answer:
“Birth of a Nation”—D. W. Griffith’s disgustingly racist yet titanically original 1915 feature—back to the fore. The movie, set mainly in a South Carolina town before and after the Civil War, depicts slavery in a halcyon light, presents blacks as good for little but subservient labor, and shows them, during Reconstruction, to have been goaded by the Radical Republicans into asserting an abusive dominion over Southern whites. It depicts freedmen as interested, above all, in intermarriage, indulging in legally sanctioned excess and vengeful violence mainly to coerce white women into sexual relations. It shows Southern whites forming the Ku Klux Klan to defend themselves against such abominations and to spur the “Aryan” cause overall. The movie asserts that the white-sheet-clad death squad served justice summarily and that, by denying blacks the right to vote and keeping them generally apart and subordinate, it restored order and civilization to the South.
“Birth of a Nation,” which runs more than three hours, was sold as a sensation and became one; it was shown at gala screenings, with expensive tickets. It was also the subject of protest by civil-rights organizations and critiques by clergymen and editorialists, and for good reason: “Birth of a Nation” proved horrifically effective at sparking violence against blacks in many cities. Given these circumstances, it’s hard to understand why Griffith’s film merits anything but a place in the dustbin of history, as an abomination worthy solely of autopsy in the study of social and aesthetic pathology.
Explanation:
Answer:
Lol Thank you so much youre an awesome person :)
Explanation:
