1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yKpoI14uk [10]
2 years ago
5

Which statement is true about the value of Dante’s assets and liabilities?

History
1 answer:
Alexeev081 [22]2 years ago
7 0

The statement that is true about Dante is that he has $50,000 more in assets than in liabilities.

Liabilities are the debts a firm has, while assets are its possessions. Both are listed on a company's balance sheet, a financial statement that illustrates the financial well-being of the business.

Equity, or an owner's net worth, is calculated as assets with fewer liabilities. The U.S. Small Business Administration advises that a company's assets should exceed its liabilities.

A corporation must have more assets than liabilities in order to have enough cash on hand to pay down its debts or easily convertible assets. A small firm will not be able to pay its bills if it has more liabilities than assets, and is therefore deemed to be in financial distress.

To learn more about liabilities refer to:

brainly.com/question/18484315

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What was the birth name of the renaissance man responsible for the ornithopter??
e-lub [12.9K]
<span>Leonardo da Vinci is the Renaissance man responsible for the ornithopter. The ornithopter is a type of aircraft whose wings flap, causing it to fly. This format mimics the natural motion of animals that fly (like bats and birds). </span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I NEED THIS DONE LIKE RIGHT NOW LIKE I NEED IT DONE WILL GIVE BRAINLEST
MAXImum [283]

Answer:

I don't know this is too hard to solve

3 0
2 years ago
What would you have done if you were one of the soldiers defending the czar during the riots?
aleksklad [387]

This Question Is one I can not answer. The question is what would YOU do, not me. But Think about this: What kind of position did the soldiers have? Where they attacking? Defending? Losing? Winning? what must have been going on in there heads? Try putting yourself in that position. If you need to, go in the lesson and find out more about the riots on czar.

8 0
2 years ago
How was William Shakespeare different from the poets and playwrights known as the University Wits?
Luba_88 [7]
Williams Shakespeare was different from the poets and copywriters known as university wits because C. He did not receive college education.
7 0
2 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do the one vote per state policy lead to unequal political representation?
    14·1 answer
  • Tribunes were powerful men who took the place of a
    7·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with these questions
    6·1 answer
  • Which sentence states the main idea of this paragraph?
    12·1 answer
  • How would the computer improve business productivity?
    5·2 answers
  • What’s the answer?????
    8·2 answers
  • The location of Nubia allowed the Nubians to
    13·2 answers
  • The names and duties of state executive departments vary from state to state.
    14·1 answer
  • Describe the route taken by the Portuguese explorers of the time period. Use directions and landmarks to give a detailed descrip
    8·1 answer
  • 3.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!