Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Answer:
The Taíno
Explanation:
The Taíno were an Arawak people who were the indigenous people of the Caribbean and Florida. At the time of European contact in the late 15th century, they were the principal inhabitants of most of Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola (the Dominican Republic and Haiti), and Puerto Rico.
The fourth alternative is correct (D).
Nations produce goods and services according to their productive capacity, their natural resources and the specialization of the workforce. In this way, some goods and services are expensive for a nation to produce, but are cheaper for other nations to produce.
Thus, if each nation specializes in the product in which it has a production advantage, nations can make tradeoffs. The country that has an advantage in the production of a good can export it to other countries and still can import the goods to which it is not specialized.
