Well basically Malcolm X was a modern-day Julius Caesar since he was murdered by the same people who helped him get started as a spokesman and they were both thought to be leaders by others. A difference in them I guess would have to be that Julius Caesar was an ancient European ruler from noble roots while Malcolm X was an African-American ex-convict turned political and social leader.
7th grade would be middle school
The slippery slope fallacy is something that many people fall into while writing something persuasive. This fallacy mostly happens when it is a primarily emotional argument with no factual support. The way it works is you make a claim that isn't entirely true, and then you base the rest of your argument on this point, even more "facts" off of this one slightly true fact you have stated. An example of this would be: "We can't allow people to go treasure hunting. By going treasure hunting people are more likely to trespass on other people's land in order to find treasure. By making trespassing less serious, people will start to loss their sense of other people's privacy. As you can see, if we allow people to pursuer treasure hunting, they will eventually start to break into other people's homes."
