It was positive because slaves could pick the cotton much faster that way, and it increased the availability of cotton for sale and for things like clothes because the cotton gin got it done so much faster
One characteristic common to all behaviorist theories of development is an emphasis on the effect of the environment on learning.
<h3>Which is a characteristic of behaviorist theory?</h3>
Behaviorism focuses on the belief that all manners are learned through interaction with the environment. This learning theory comments that behaviors are learned from the environment, and displays that innate or inherited factors have very little impact on behavior.
Behaviorism highlights the role of environmental factors in affecting behavior, to the near exclusion of natural or inherited factors. One characteristic shared by all behaviorist learning approaches is an emphasis on the effect of the environment on education.
To learn more about the environment on learning visit the link
brainly.com/question/14924825
#SPJ4
The given statement is True.
The conflict in the intimacy versus isolation stage is ability to form healthy intimate relationship.
Explanation:
Erik Erikson gave a theory of psychological development that comprises of many stages. Intimacy versus Isolation is the sixth stage of his proposed theory.
This is the stage that starts in the early adulthood and lasts till the mid adulthood. It lasts between the age from 19 to 40.
In this phase of life, a person either makes a loving and intimate relationship with other person, which is Intimacy, OR fails to find a partner, which makes him isolated from the world, which is Isolation.
The conflict in this stage is the ability to form a healthy intimate relationship.
Learn more about Erikson's theory of psychological development at:
brainly.com/question/5486193
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
The four American presidents that are displayed in the Mount Rushmore Natinal Memorial are: George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt y Abraham Lincoln.
Answer: Both revolutions are the result of the struggle for freedom.
Explanation:
Poor population status, the laws of the subject are similarities between the American war for independence and the Syrian civil war. In America, the British forced the population to fight and revolution.
In Syria, Bashar el-Assad, through his bad policies and laws, but the majority of the Syrian people in an awkward position, who rose in despair against the tyranny of the individual. In both cases, the authorities did not take into account the place of the people and their position, which resulted in the uprising.
