Raw materials transform finished goods into cash.
Answer:
the answer should be
a. Overhead can be applied slowly as a job is worked on.
Answer: Higher; Comparative advantage
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
United states's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 5 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Canada's Opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes = 
= 2 apples have to be foregone for producing a pair of shoes
Hence, Canada has a comparative advantage in producing pairs of shoes because Canada's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is lower than United states opportunity cost.
Answer:
Central, Peripheral
Explanation:
The advert is intended to highlight the pros of the particular car. However, the ad agency recognizes that to convince prospective buyers they must explore different options to persuasion. The car's safety and gas mileage are the Central Route. The driving fun is the Peripheral
The main problem with this team seems to be centered around differences in the formality of structure.
Cross-functional Work Team
This type of work team happens when individuals or groups of different functions come together to work together towards a common goal. This can either be done by two or more team leads to take the initiative or if there is a certain company project where employees of specific skills are required from different departments to do the job.
Problems with Cross-functional Team
There are certain problems faced when working in cross-functional teams. One of which is time management, where the team must meet up to manage the project and to discuss its further development. In the given question "time orientation" this certainly is not the main problem.
Another important factor is that employee success is based on goals and objectives. In doing so, the individual becomes more focused on their personal goals and loses sight of what is more important to prioritize, which is the company as a whole. Of course, this means that neither the interpersonal nor the goal orientation is the main problem arising between the team.
Finally, when more individuals come together to form a team, there is a chance that there might be dominating personalities in the group. This would cause difficulties among the group unless a leader is determined to manage the team. Now, this is the main problem here, as there is no formality of structure defined. Resulting in the dispute between managers and scientists. To avoid any further dispute formal structure must be laid out and a leader should be appointed amongst them.
Learn more on cross-functional team here: brainly.com/question/1490525
