I think it is about a frog that drank water and soup and no has a bubble in his trot. :))
Explanation:
Both writers "<span>inspire people to stay committed to the cause of American freedom", since although they had different views on the best way to obtain that freedom, they both agreed that it was nonsensical for the colonies to remain subservient to the Crown. </span>
Answer:
Uh first of all. Dark. Second, here's your answer:
Explanation:
The author implies that a child would be a great meal basically, by stating quite a few things: "A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends, and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt, will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter," then "I grant this food will be somewhat dear... as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children."
Looks like the author is a bit of a cannibal. Uh. Yeah, hope this helps. If you need anymore help, just lmk <3
No, because a priest or religious leader is just a normal person like you and me, there is nothing special about them. In fact, I would not automatically trust anyone. Priests, at least in my opinion, I trust less than others because most of what they say if ruled by the bias of god's law and not rational thinking.
May I have brainliest please? :)