All categories

2 years ago

According to interdependency theory, the net profit or loss a person encounters in a particular interaction is known as the?

1 answer:

4 0

According to interdependency theory, the net profit or loss a person encounters in a particular interaction is known as the outcomes.

According to the social exchange theory known as interdependence, interpersonal interdependence—which is defined as "the process through which interacting people impact one another's experiences"—defines interpersonal relationships.

The consequences of this structure for human psychology are discussed in the interdependence theory along with the structural characteristics that define relationships. The interdependence theory views the relationships between people as being as important as the individuals themselves, in contrast to most psychological theories that place a strong emphasis on the individual, contending that people's distinct experiences, cognitions, or personalities are to blame for how they behave.

This makes the theory a truly social psychological one and provides a much-needed explanation of the nature and consequences of interdependence.

To learn more about interdependence here,

brainly.com/question/3639547

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Ron is an avid reader. he has a large vocabulary because every time he comes across a word he doesn’t know, he looks it up in th

sdas [7]

Ok give me a starrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrs

7 0

3 years ago

Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows (in millions):

eimsori [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

4. If WACC = 5% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 4% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.952 0.962 $14.28 $14.43

2 $13 0.907 0.925 $11.791 $12.025

3 $3 0.864 0.889 $2.592 $2.667

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 0.337 m NPV = -$0.122 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 4% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 4%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 3% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.952 0.971 $7.616 $7.768

2 $3 0.907 0.943 $2.721 $2.829

3 $6 0.864 0.915 $5.184 $5.49

__________ ____________

NPV = -$ 0.479 m NPV= - $ .087

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 3% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 3%

5. If WACC = 10% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.909 0.926 $13.635 $13.89

2 $13 0.826 0.857 $10.738 $11.141

3 $3 0.751 0.792 $2.253 $2.376

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 2.374 m NPV = -$1.593 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.909 0.926 $ 7.272 $7.408

2 $3 0.826 0.857 $ 2.478 $2.571

3 $6 0.751 0.792 $ 4.506 $4.752

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 1.744 m NPV= - $1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

6. If WACC = 15% , IRR =?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$ 1.593

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

7.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

NPV of project B > project A than choose Project B

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project BYear Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Because of policy lags in monetary policy, the fed:.

ludmilkaskok [199]

As a result of policy lags in monetary policy, the Federal Resrve System (Fed): must try to anticipate changes in the economy before they happen.

<h3>What is a monetary policy?</h3>

In Economics, a monetary policy is also referred to as fiscal policy and it can be defined as the use of government expenditures (spending) and revenues through taxation, so as to influence macroeconomic conditions in a country such as:

Aggregate Demand (AD)

Employment within a country.

Inflation

Ideally, the Federal Resrve System (Fed) must try to anticipate changes in the economy of the United States of America before they happen because of policy lags in monetary policy.

Read more on monetary policy here: brainly.com/question/13926715

6 0

2 years ago

Oriole Company’s comparative balance sheets are presented below: Oriole Company Comparative Balance Sheets December 31 2020 2019

lukranit [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

Oriole Company

Statement of cash flow

For the year ending 2020

Cash flows from Operating Activities

Net Income $18,250

Adjustments to reconcile net income to

net cash provided by operating activities:

Add: Loss on sale of equipment

($9,900 - $2,000 - $3,400) $4,500

Depreciation on Fixed Assets ($14,250 - $10,400 - $2,000) $1,850

(Increase) Decrease in current assets:

Accounts receivable ($25,000 - $22,200) ($2,800)

Increase (Decrease) in current liabilities:

Accounts Payable ($14,850 - $11,050) $3,800

Net Cash provided by operating activities $25,600

Cash flows from Investing Activities

Disposal of Equipment $3,400

Net Cash used in Investing Activities $3,400

Cash flows from Financing Activities

Payments on Bonds Payable ($10,100 - $30,100) ($20,000)

Common Stock ($50,100 - $44,700) $5,400

Dividends paid ($15,400)

Net Cash used in financing activities ($30,000)

Beginning Cash Balance $17,600

Ending Cash Balance $16,500

5 0

4 years ago

You are calculating the volume quantity needed for material that will compact to 95% of its original undisturbed volume. You kno

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

Volume = 1565.56 cubic yards

Explanation:

The computation of the volume of material required is shown below:

95% × volume = 1,487 cubic yards

Volume = 1565.56 cubic yards

Basically 95% of volume is equivalent to the 1487 cubic yards

So according to this we determined the volume

Hence, the same should be considered

3 0

3 years ago