1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ryzh [129]
2 years ago
6

The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clea

r and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.
–Schenck v. United States
Use the excerpt to answer the question.
In this excerpt, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explains his ruling in Schenck v. United States. What argument is Holmes making about personal rights and free speech?
A. The constitutional protection of free speech is absolute, and each person has a right to express his or herself however he or she wishes.
B. The government has the authority to prohibit or limit free speech whenever it wants and for any reason.
C. The protection of free speech is important, but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
D. The public has the responsibility to decide when people are abusing their right to free speech.
History
1 answer:
Assoli18 [71]2 years ago
3 0

The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>

The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.

Read more about Schenck v. United States

<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Lisa experiences severe mood swings, persistent sadness, and frequent crying. She can feel very happy one minute and extremely s
LenKa [72]
The answer that would make the most sense is bipolar disorder. 
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the direct causes of the American Revolution? no
Goshia [24]

Answer:

The 7 year war

Taxes and duties

Boston Massacre (1770)

Boston Tea Party (1773)

Intolerable Acts (1774)

King George III’s Speech to Parliament (1775)

Explanation:

The Seven Years War was a multinational conflict, the main belligerents were the British and French Empires. Each looking to expand their territory across numerous continents, both nations suffered mass casualties and racked up copious amounts of debt in order to fund the long and ardous struggle for territorial dominance which led to economic hardship in the US and an acknowledgment of the cultural differences between colonists and Britons. making it one of the key roles that led to the war

Taxes and Duties

The taxes and duties caused outrage in the colonies and became the main root of spontaneous and violent opposition. Encouraged and rallied by propaganda leaflets and posters, such as those created by Paul Revere, colonists rioted and organised merchant boycotts. Eventually, the colonial response was met with fierce repression

Boston Massacre (1770)

The Boston Massacre is often represented as the inevitable start of a revolution, but in fact it initially prompted Lord North’s government to withdraw the Townshend Acts and for a time it seemed like the worst of the crisis was over. However, radicals such as Samuel Adams and Thomas Jefferson kept the resentment ticking over.

Boston Tea Party (1773)

it was in December 1773 that the most famous and overt display of anger and resistance took place. A group of colonists led by Adams hopped aboard the East India Company trade vessel Dartmouth and poured 342 chests of tea (worth close to $2,000,000 in today’s currency) of British tea into the sea at Boston Harbour. This act – now known as the ‘Boston Tea Party’, remains important in patriotic American folklore.

Intolerable Acts (1774)

Rather than attempting to appease the rebels, the Boston Tea Party was met with the passing of the Intolerable Acts in 1774 by the British Crown. These punitive measures included the forced closure of Boston port and an order of compensation to the East India Company for damaged property. Town meetings were now also banned, and the authority of the royal governor was increased.

The British lost further support and patriots formed the First Continental Congress in the same year, a body where men from all the colonies were formally represented. In Britain, opinion was divided as the Whigs favoured reform while North’s Tories wanted to demonstrate the power of the British Parliament. It would be the Tories who got their way.

In the meantime, the First Continental Congress raised a militia, and in April 1775 the first shots of the war were fired as British troops clashed with militia men at the twin battles of Lexington and Concord. British reinforcements landed in Massachusetts and defeated the rebels at Bunker Hill in June – the first major battle of the American War of Independence.

King George III’s Speech to Parliament (1775)

On 26 October 1775 George III, King of Great Britain, stood up in front of his Parliament and declared the American colonies to be in a state of rebellion. Here, for the first time, the use of force was authorised against the rebels. The King’s speech was long but certain phrases made it clear that a major war against his own subjects was about to commence:

<em>“It is now become the part of wisdom, and (in its effects) of clemency, to put a speedy end to these disorders by the most decisive exertions. For this purpose, I have increased my naval establishment, and greatly augmented my land forces, but in such a manner as may be the least burthensome to my kingdoms.”</em>

After such a speech, the Whig position was silenced and a full-scale war was inevitable. From it the United States of America would emerge, and the course of history radically changed<em>.</em>

<em />

<em />

8 0
2 years ago
Who was ambassador to Great Britain?
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

C John Adams

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
EE<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> E<br> EEE<br> E<br> E<br> EE
babymother [125]
The 3rd one is the correct answer
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLSSS HELP IF YOU TURLY KNOW THISS NO Files
Finger [1]

Answer:

its B

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement about the South after 1890 is FALSE?
    13·1 answer
  • Which city currently charges drivers a "congestion toll" to drive into the heart of the city's financial, legal, and entertainme
    7·1 answer
  • Voter participation in the United states
    9·1 answer
  • What caused the depression Martin Van Buren faced as president?
    5·2 answers
  • HELLLPPP!!!!<br><br> what was the consequences of the trade deficit?
    7·1 answer
  • What did one of the Cold War conflicts take place in
    7·1 answer
  • Choose the hominid that scientists believe is NOT a direct ancestor of modern people.
    8·1 answer
  • Who built the first t.v in history.
    10·1 answer
  • What two old empires struggled to survive in an age of nationalism?
    12·1 answer
  • Who were the Navajo Code Talkers during World War II?
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!