1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
3 years ago
7

Which scenario is most similar to how great britain treated its colonies during the industrial revolution

History
2 answers:
lbvjy [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D. A movie theater makes a rule that customers can only eat snack purchased at the theater.

Explanation:

This is the example that best resembles how Great Britain treated its colonies during the Industrial Revolution. During these years, many countries experienced significant development, including Great Britain. In order to ensure that a market existed for the products that Great Britain created, Great Britain restricted the trade of the colonies so that they could only trade with Great Britain. This is equivalent to the example of the movie theatre.

WARRIOR [948]3 years ago
4 0
The correct answer is
<span>D. a movie theater makes a rule that customers can only eat snack purchased at the theater.

This was called mercantilism. Basically, Great Britain, who was like the movie theater, made the colonies, who were like the customers, to trade only with Great Britain and nobody else, that is they made them only eat snacks from the theater. This was common for colonies of other nations too.</span>
You might be interested in
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain un
Lady bird [3.3K]

This past weekend marked the 234th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence.  And while much has changed since the signers met in secret to dissolve the bands that tied them to England, their words are as true today as they have ever been. 


The preamble to the Declaration states:


<span>
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government …</span>

The arrangement of this statement reveals the founders’ belief that individual rights pre-exist the establishment of a government-- a radical notion at the time.  The Declaration begins, “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”  By referring to the aspects of the subsequent statement as "self-evident truths," the founders insist that they do not merely apply to colonists but rather that they are universal.  Included in these universal truths is the idea, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”  This bold assertion insists that no one life is more valuable than the next, and that—by virtue of sharing the same rights—no individual has the authority to rule over or oppress another.


Moreover, the equal rights shared by all humans are “unalienable.”  They cannot be taken away.  This is because they are granted not by any man or institution but rather they are “endowed” upon individuals by their Creator.  Only the One who grants rights has the authority to take them away.


Although the founders believed in the unalienable rights of every person, they also understood that there will always be forces in this world that seek to oppress.  Thus, “to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it.”  Put simply, the government possesses no rights.  Its sole purpose is to protect the rights of its citizenry from outside forces.  If it fails in this duty, it is the responsibility of individuals to abolish it.


The writers of the Declaration—and subsequently the writers of the Constitution—believed that government’s power comes out of its ability to protect the rights of its people.  Individuals do not receive natural rights from government and thus government does not have the authority to take rights away.  To the extent that it protects individual rights, government operates legitimately.  However, when it fails to protect such rights or when it imposes upon them, it becomes an illegitimate ruler over what would otherwise be free people.


When the founding fathers gathered in 1776, they did not merely declare the independence of the colonies from their British oppressors.  They declared the independence of all individuals from the unlawful intrusion of overreaching government.  And that declaration forever altered the course of human history.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe what conditions were like at Andersonville Prison. Give several details.
oee [108]

Answer:

horrible and gross.

 They were all nearly naked, they suffered from swarms of insects, filth, and disease, much of which was generated by the contaminated water supply of the creek, it was also overcrowded to four times its capacity, there was also inadequate food and unsanitary conditions.

 Andersonville had the highest mortality rate of any Civil War prison. Nearly 13,000 of the 45,000 men who entered the stockade died there, chiefly of malnourishment

-------

Hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe early humans
g100num [7]
Early humans were most likely the natives and british they discovered most of our land we have today
6 0
4 years ago
Why is trade with India difficult in the North ?
leva [86]

Answer:

Because the travel time

Explanation:

Hoped i Helped :)

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a result of the French and Indian war?
Katyanochek1 [597]
One result was that King George III would not let colonists settle west of the Appalachian Mountains.
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe the Whiskey Rebellion and the government's actions in response to it.
    6·2 answers
  • Which languages are parts of the Indo-European language family? -Chinese, French, Russian -Greek, English, Italian -Latin, Japan
    13·2 answers
  • A key part of the Mayflower Compact was that the colonists
    13·2 answers
  • Emboldened by the election of president ulysses grant, who supported the congressional reconstruction agenda, congress passed th
    10·1 answer
  • How did involvement with Europeans in this region change how Americans Indians there lived
    9·2 answers
  • The Enlightenment thinker Baron de Montesquieu came up with the idea of
    11·2 answers
  • Of what nationality were over 200 American military soldiers who deserted the
    12·1 answer
  • After the Civil War, Why did the South rejoin the Union?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following influenced the United States culturally and politically after War of 1812?
    12·1 answer
  • Need help getting started pls
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!