Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the rest of the question states:
<em>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?</em>
<em>A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.</em>
<em>B. Even if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, people would not vote for either person.</em>
<em>C. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would continue to vote for Smith.</em>
<em>D. Even if Senator Smith decided not to run for office again, many people would vote for him as a write-in candidate.</em>
The prediction that is most likely to happen is that, if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would vote for him. We know, based on the passage, that Senator Smith is not well-liked among voters, as he is not considered to be responsive to the needs of voters. Therefore, it is very possible that Senator Smith would find it difficult to compete with another candidate.
I believe that democracy is the best governance because democrats have a discrete opinion on what they believe in. They believe that we need good healthcare and we need to be even in wealth so that everyone can live a good long life and everyone feels equal. <span />
Answer: The Mexican-American War was waged mostly by federal Army volunteers. Although this may not seem like a constitutional issue, it reflected debates about military power that were banked into the constitutional and the interaction of Article I's Army and Militia clauses.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
I believe you are referring to the evacuation of Saigon (Fall of Saigon) on April 30, 1975. If so, the correct answer is c. The U.S. evacuated Vietnamese whose lives would be in the greatest danger if they were to be left behind.
