1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masha68 [24]
2 years ago
14

What is the opportunity cost in this

History
1 answer:
Vera_Pavlovna [14]2 years ago
7 0

The opportunity cost in the scenario above is the three lost possibilities, Harry could have undergone but decided to go to his parents house.

  1. Hid plans to paint his flat that weekend.
  2. He considered also going fishing for the weekend.
  3. Hi friend Theo request to the surprise birthday reception for another friend.

<h3>What is the opportunity cost in the scenario?</h3>

“Possibility cost is the weight of the next-best option when a decision is made; it's what is given up,” describes Andrea Caceres-Santamaria, aging financial education specialist at the St. Louis Fed, in a current Page One Economics: Money and Skipped Opportunities

To learn more about scenario , refer

brainly.com/question/14846093

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
The documentary “in the shadow of the gold mountain” included negative comments from several politicians in the late 19th and 20
olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Politicians back then were very racist and up to today we still have Politicians who are racist but to more then 1 Minority, the documentary talked about a set of laws imposed to single out the Chinese as unwanted immigrants to Canada from 1885 to 1947, to this day we still have laws that have some hold on some Minorities and with the recent being "The battle of voting rights" everyone is well known of what is going on with, and according to a article written by New York times,<em> </em>

<em>"Republicans aggressively fought both the voting measure and the attempt to weaken the filibuster. They accused Democrats of manufacturing a crisis by exaggerating the impact of new state laws in an effort to realize a longstanding goal of gaining more control over state elections — and risking the uniqueness of the Senate to do so." </em><em>
</em>

Another thing that also stood out was this statement made in the same article.
<em>"In a day of sharp exchanges, one of the most dramatic was between two of the Senate’s three Black members, who </em><em>clashed over </em><em>charges by Democrats that the</em><em> Republicans’ opposition to the legislation</em><em> was a </em><em>throwback to the Jim Crow days of denying Black Americans the vote.</em>"

The whole point of this is to stand with my answer being that "yes" politicians would make the same comments, <em>though</em> it may not be the exact words they can still have the same meaning, over the centuries many Minorities have had their fair share with comments from many Government officials and categorized politicians. Though we cannot leave this unseen, the <em>United States president alone having his fair share with racism</em> just shows that the way our government is now days is <u><em>no where near better then from back then,</em></u> and it shows how much power they have, they can say anything they want and pretty much get away with it, IMO I feel the way <u><em>our system is heading is in a circle, comparing and contrasting from today to the way past politics have been has showed similar traits</em></u>. Racism in politics is never ending no matter how many new "justices..presidents..etc.." we get it will always be the same rotation and that is why I feel that politicians today would make the same comments, because nothing has changed from the past Historic events.

Hope this helps !

4 0
3 years ago
Ha existido igualdad social en el Perú durante estos 199 años republicanos
jek_recluse [69]

Answer:

xdy fh your om hu

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
The Zhou Dynasty ended in
Anna35 [415]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
What was the purpose of the law of suspects?
monitta

The law of suspects was passed on 17 September 1793, that was authorized to create the revolutionary tribunals to arrests the enemies of the people and country.

<h3>Who founded the law of suspects? What was the main purpose of the law of suspect?</h3>

Law of suspects is the legal order that was introduced by the Robespierre in 1793.

The main purpose of the law of suspect was to protect the revolution from its enemies. It empowered the revolutionary tribunals to arrest those, who have show themselves as the promoter of the tyranny and enemies of the liberty.

Basically, it takes the harsh actions like convicted to death for those people.

Learn more about the law of suspects here:-

brainly.com/question/900659

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
In 1808 the U.S. banned the importation of slaves. What did many people hope this would lead to?
strojnjashka [21]
A. a swift end to slavery in the U.S
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why do myths use metaphor to communicate?
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! I need to write an exciting story , pretending you are living on a frontier.
    13·1 answer
  • According the mercantilist theories what relationship is correct?
    12·2 answers
  • A traditional economy is characterized by the_______ of goods in which two people trade their possessions with each other
    12·2 answers
  • What effect did the financial crisis and recession have upon world trade in 2011?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best summarizes the status of world was ll technology today
    5·1 answer
  • How did the British colonies settle in america?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the new nation's economic problems persuade many people, especially rich ones, that the government needed more legal pow
    5·1 answer
  • What is your impression of the Crusades based on this video? Were the European crusaders heroes? Why or why not?
    7·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of an allied nation during the war in Europe
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!