Answer:
During the 1950's many parents did not like Rock and Roll because they thought that it caused juvenile delinquency. At the time the music contained sexual ...
Explanation:
Answer:
A greater supply of domestic goods
Explanation:
A country that creates a subsidy for domestic goods is most likely to experience the benefits of "A greater supply of domestic goods."
This is because, as domestic goods are subsidized, the price of goods will be cheaper to buy in the market. In turn, the citizens will be willing to demand more domestic products and ultimately leads to more supply of domestic products.
Other benefits include reduction of goods prices and control of inflation. Also, it will help prevent the deterioration of industries in the country.
answer is about once a year
Answer:
<h2><u><em>
the use of gunpowder</em></u></h2>
Explanation:
The Ottomans' military success was largely based on the use of gunpowder. They replaced their archers on horseback with musket-carrying foot soldiers. They also were among the first people to use cannons as offensive weapons. Even heavily walled cities fell to an all-out attack by the Turks.
PLEASE do:
<h2><u><em>
BRAINLEIST~~~~ </em></u>
pls uwu</h2>
The Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
