Answer:
They were concerned in giving the national government more power.
They felt that the states had too much power.
They felt that the Constitution did nothing to protect the peoples' rights
Explanation:
The main issues the Antifederalists had
with the US Constitution was that they felt the national government had too much power, the constitution did not protect the rights of people, and the states had too much power.
Anti-Federalists were against the 1787 United States Constitution because they did not feel the Constitution protected the rights of the people and the central government wielded much power.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Olympics brought people from all over the world that started to settle in.
(Brainliest?)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Thomas allows public tracking of legislation online
Answer:
An celestial object is a object found in outer space.
A Moon is an object that revolves around a planet.
Answer:Machiavelli’s realism
Niccolò Machiavelli, whose work derived from sources as authentically humanistic as those of Ficino, proceeded along a wholly opposite course. A throwback to the chancellor-humanists Salutati, Bruni, and Poggio, he served Florence in a similar capacity and with equal fidelity, using his erudition and eloquence in a civic cause. Like Vittorino and other early humanists, he believed in the centrality of historical studies, and he performed a signally humanistic function by creating, in La mandragola (1518; The Mandrake), the first vernacular imitation of Roman comedy. His unswerving concentration on human weakness and institutional corruption suggests the influence of Boccaccio; and, like Boccaccio, he used these reminders less as topical satire than as practical gauges of human nature. In one way at least, Machiavelli is more humanistic (i.e., closer to the classics) than the other humanists, for while Vittorino and his school ransacked history for examples of virtue, Machiavelli (true to the spirit of Polybius, Livy, Plutarch, and Tacitus) embraced all of history—good, evil, and indifferent—as his school of reality. Like Salutati, though perhaps with greater self-awareness, Machiavelli was ambiguous as to the relative merits of republics and monarchies. In both public and private writings—especially the Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio (1531; Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy)—he showed a marked preference for republican government, but in The Prince (1532) he developed, with apparent approval, a model of radical autocracy. For this reason, his goals have remained unclear.
Explanation: