1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Goshia [24]
2 years ago
7

Which of the following most accurately describes the impact of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

History
1 answer:
ivann1987 [24]2 years ago
8 0

Option D: The cities were destroyed and are uninhabitable to the present day.

On August 6 and 9, 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The two bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 people, mostly civilians, and remains the only use of nuclear weapons in an armed conflict.

Is there still radiation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Radiation levels in Hiroshima and Nagasaki today are consistent with the very low background levels (natural radioactivity) found anywhere on Earth. There is no effect on the human body.

The plutonium bomb detonated at Nagasaki was actually more powerful than the one used at Hiroshima. Much of the reason for the higher casualty numbers in the latter city is due to the different physical characteristics of the two cities.

Learn more about Hiroshima and Nagasaki here brainly.com/question/492664

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
What was the period following the civil War call
kvasek [131]
Reconstruction occurred after the Civil War, lasting from 1865 to 1877.
So the answer is A. Reconstruction.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
How was the English more successful than the Spanish at planting colonies?
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

Early European colonies in the New World succeeded only if local Indians allowed them to and if they were lucky. When European settlers arrived in the New World, they often placed their colonies among people who had established complex webs of political relationships that included both alliances and rivalries. If Indians tolerated settlements they could easily have wiped out, they may have done so not because they were afraid of the settlers or kindly disposed to them or militarily weak but rather because they saw them as useful adjuncts in their own internal power struggles

Explanation:

sana makatulong(ᵔᴥᵔ)

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the 3 main reasons for the US declaring war on britan/england​
fredd [130]

Answer:

..

Explanation:

1. No Rights

2.Unneeded taxes

3. No talk in Parliament

4 0
3 years ago
What arguments for or against the use of Native American mascots exist?
vovikov84 [41]
<span>What do you need to know?</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why would the preamble include a list of beliefs?A to emotionally move the reader
    9·2 answers
  • What was the most important effect of Ramses II’s long reign?
    6·2 answers
  • Should the industrialists be known as "Captains of Industry" or as "Robber Barons"? Why?
    8·1 answer
  • Alexander the great during his childhood was considered an unacceptable heir by the greeks because:
    8·1 answer
  • The linguistic relatively hypothesis holds that different languages described the world in the same ways true or false ?
    13·1 answer
  • Good evening, my fellow citizens. This Government,
    14·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE ASAP THANK YOU VERY MUCH
    12·1 answer
  • anybody know some good people to do a black history project on?(maybe someone not a lot of people know about)
    9·2 answers
  • One of the geographical advantages of early Rome:
    9·2 answers
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs. Match the officers in the executive branch of the Oklahoma state gove
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!