Why was the korematsu vs united states case important?

1 answer:

6 0

Korematsu vs. US was a Supreme Court case regarding the treatment of Japanese-American citizens during World War II. Shortly after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. This allowed for the US government to remove any people from their homes in military zones.

This order lead to the internment of hundreds of thousands of Japanese-American citizens. Korematsu challenged this act as unconstitutional and argued that these Japanese-American citizens were not given their 14th amendment rights.

However, the court ruled in favor of the government, stating that the safety and security of America as a whole triumphs the right of the individual.

You might be interested in

With the threat of World War III on the horizon, the Cuban Missile Crisis was finally resolved by: a promise that the U.S. would

Sedbober [7]

<span>With the threat of World War III on the horizon, the Cuban Missile Crisis was finally resolved by: a promise that the U.S. would never invade Cuba Fidel</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A sea is usually defined as

Mamont248 [21]

Answer:

Sea is the salt water covering the Earth or a large body of salt water which is partially enclosed by land. An example of the sea are the oceans of the world

Explanation:

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The case of Furman v. Georgia (1972) resulted in a reinterpretation of the meaning of

pshichka [43]

I believe the answer is that Furman vs. Georgia led to a reinterpretation of the meaning of cruel and unusual punishment.

4 0

4 years ago

Which did you include in your answer? Demand higher wages join forces with other employees try to get into a skilled trade try t

Alona [7]

Changes in the wage rate (the price of labor) cause a movement along the demand curve. A change in anything else that affects demand for labor (e.g., changes in output, changes in the production process that use more or less labor, government regulation) causes a shift in the demand curve.

Changes in the wage rate (the price of labor) cause a movement along the supply curve. A change in anything else that affects supply of labor (e.g., changes in how desirable the job is perceived to be, government policy to promote training in the field) causes a shift in the supply curve.

Since a living wage is a suggested minimum wage, it acts like a price floor (assuming, of course, that it is followed). If the living wage is binding, it will cause an excess supply of labor at that wage rate.

5 0

3 years ago

Navigation Acts supported the policy of mercantilism, which stated that:

strojnjashka [21]

I think it’s c sorry if I’m wrong

3 0

3 years ago